Skip to content
Dan Markel— Case Archive
evidenceevidencetestimonyMagbanua RetrialRivera's testimonyRivera's testimony was central to arguments on Magbanua's motion for judgment of acquittal. Defense counsel argued that it was the only direct evidence of her involvement, while the State argued that Rivera described her hiring, paying, and directing the murder.
← All Evidence
Testimony References

Rivera's testimony

Rivera's testimony was central to arguments on Magbanua's motion for judgment of acquittal. Defense counsel argued that it was the only direct evidence of her involvement, while the State argued that Rivera described her hiring, paying, and directing the murder.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The court found Rivera's testimony, together with other direct and circumstantial evidence, sufficient for the jury to consider principal liability, conspiracy, and solicitation charges.

Trial Record (1)