Skip to content
personpersonStuart SchlazerStuart SchlazerMusic teacher who was speaking by phone with Dan Markel when Markel mentioned an “unfamiliar person,” then heard a loud sound followed by breathing and no further speech.← All People
Witness

Stuart Schlazer

Courtroom still of Stuart Schlazer.

Music teacher who was speaking by phone with Dan Markel when Markel mentioned an “unfamiliar person,” then heard a loud sound followed by breathing and no further speech.

14 lines·3 proceedings·1 mention

About

Called by the State on trial day 1 and identified on the record by spelling ("S-C-H-L-A-Z-E-R"), Stuart Schlazer testified as a music teacher who had been consulting with Dan Markel about the School of Arts and Sciences. On direct examination, Schlazer described a telephone call with Markel on the morning of July 18, 2014, during which Markel asked him to hold the line because there was an "unfamiliar person" in his driveway. Schlazer held, heard a loud sound, and then heard Markel breathing but never speaking again. He testified that he shouted into the phone asking whether Markel was okay, got no response, hung up, sent a text message, and called 911.

The direct examination was brief and confined to that call sequence. It recorded what Markel said before the loud sound and what Schlazer heard afterward without establishing the exact instant of the shooting.

Cross-examination by Garcia's counsel Saam Zangeneh was limited to three questions on a single point: whether Schlazer's sworn statement to law enforcement had used the singular form, "unfamiliar person," rather than a plural. Schlazer confirmed the prior statement, while stating that five years had passed and he could not independently recall whether the word had been singular or plural; what he retained was the adjective "unfamiliar." Magbanua's counsel declined to cross-examine and the State waived redirect, so the testimony arc closed after direct and cross.

The court then released Schlazer from his subpoena and recessed the jury for lunch. Schlazer's name recurred later in the trial when the State, in argument, cited Markel's call to him about his sons' schooling prospects as the last thing Markel did that morning.

Trial Record (3)

GMGarcia–MagbanuaSep 26, 2019 – Oct 11, 2019Called by prosecution

Testified on trial day 1 about a phone call in which Markel mentioned an unfamiliar person, after which Schlazer heard a loud sound followed by breathing and no further speech.

Day 1

DirectStuart SchlazerGeorgia Cappleman2highlights11lines spoken

Summary

Music teacher Stuart Schlazer testified that Markel mentioned an “unfamiliar person” during their phone call, after which Schlazer heard a loud sound followed by breathing and no further speech.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightSchlazer recounted Markel pausing the call to note an “unfamiliar person” in his driveway, followed by a loud sound, breathing, and no further speech.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quote“He said, "Can you please hold on a second? There's an unfamiliar person in my driveway." I said, "Yeah, sure," and then I waited for him to get back to me. He never did. I heard a loud sound, and then I heard him breathing like this. He never spoke another word to me. I asked him, "Are you okay?" I screamed into the phone, "Are you okay?" And then I hung up and texted him, "Are you okay? Is everything okay?" And then I called 911.”— Stuart SchlazerSchlazer described Markel mentioning an unfamiliar person, followed by a loud sound, breathing, and no further speech.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
CrossStuart SchlazerSaam Zangeneh2highlights3lines spoken

Summary

Zangeneh's three-question cross locked in Schlazer's prior sworn statement describing the driveway visitor as a single 'unfamiliar person,' not multiple persons.

Highlights (2)

Quote“The word that struck me the most was "unfamiliar." I believe he said person — person. But I It's been five years. I don't remember the exact plural or singular form of the word.”— Stuart SchlazerReveals that Schlazer's clearest memory of Markel's description was the adjective 'unfamiliar' rather than the number of people — honest about memory limits while confirming the word's impact on him.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
impeachmentZangeneh confronted Schlazer with his prior sworn law-enforcement statement, in which he had used the singular 'unfamiliar person.' Schlazer confirmed the statement was accurate while acknowledging he could not independently recall the exact number five years later.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 10

ClosingClosing Argument - Georgia CapplemanMentioned

Summary

Lead prosecutor Georgia Cappleman presented the State's murder-for-hire theory, argued that cell-phone, GPS, surveillance, and financial evidence corroborated Rivera, and portrayed Magbanua as the link between the Adelsons and Garcia and Rivera.

Mentioned in this proceeding.