Skip to content
personpersonKelsey GuayKelsey GuayDefense digital-forensics examiner who reviewed Donna, Charlie, and Harvey Adelson call records, including disputed totals and July 18 cell-site activity.← All People
Expert witness

Kelsey Guay

Courtroom still of Kelsey Guay.

Defense digital-forensics examiner who reviewed Donna, Charlie, and Harvey Adelson call records, including disputed totals and July 18 cell-site activity.

160 lines·7 proceedings

About

Kelsey Guay, a digital-forensics examiner, testified for the defense on Day 7 about her review of call-detail records associated with Donna, Charlie, and Harvey Adelson. She explained how overlapping date ranges, voicemail routing, and network-generated rows can create multiple records for a single call event, making manual review necessary when calculating communication totals.

Guay said she could not reproduce a chart total of 417 communications between Donna and Charlie. For a separate period, she counted 69 unique connected or attempted call events rather than 80. After deduplicating Donna's records from May 2 through July 20, she identified 211 unique call events.

In the July 18 records she reviewed, Guay did not find Donna's handset connecting to a tower that could cover Charlie's home or the two handsets connecting to the same tower. She acknowledged that she had not received an AT&T master cell-site list and did not dispute the cell-site mapping presented at trial. She also agreed that the frequency reports accurately represented the raw records and that Charlie was Donna's most frequent contact during the specified period, while maintaining that duplicate events could affect the totals.

Guay testified that an iCloud message stating "Outside your house" contained no location data and that she found no call to the identified Annie Cunningham number from noon through midnight on July 18. She explained that third-party app communications appear as data transactions in carrier records, which could not establish whether a particular app-based call occurred. After recross established that Donna used ordinary voice calls with other people that day, Guay identified three calls shown between 8:30 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. that night. She also disclosed that her company charged the defense $300 per hour, including travel time, and estimated the trial trip at about $10,000.

Trial Record (7)

DADonna AdelsonAug 22, 2025 – Sep 4, 2025Called by defense

Kelsey Guay analyzed call-detail records for the defense on Day 7, addressing communication totals, possible duplicate entries, and Donna and Charlie Adelson's July 18 phone records.

Day 7

DirectKelsey Guay - DirectKelsey GuayJoshua D. Zelman4highlights69lines spoken

Summary

Digital-forensics examiner Kelsey Guay challenged frequency-chart totals in Adelson call records and gave limited cell-site testimony for July 18, 2014.

Highlights (4)

testimony highlightGuay testified that manual review of Donna and Charlie Adelson call records produced lower frequency totals than the chart she reviewed, explaining that overlapping dates and multiple record rows could reflect a single call event.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quote“I wasn't able to come up with 417.”— Kelsey GuayGuay said she could not reproduce the chart's stated total for communications between Charlie and Donna Adelson.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
testimony highlightGuay testified that the records she reviewed did not show Donna Adelson's handset connecting to a tower that could cover Charlie Adelson's home, or the two handsets connecting to the same tower, on July 18, 2014.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
CrossKelsey Guay - CrossKelsey GuaySarah Kathryn Dugan3highlights67lines spoken

Summary

Guay confirmed parts of the State's phone-record analysis, found no July 18 call to the identified Annie Cunningham number, and described her defense-paid fees.

Highlights (3)

testimony highlightGuay agreed she did not dispute the mapped cell sites and sectors for the referenced travel analysis, while explaining that the iCloud message saying "Outside your house" had no associated location data.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
admissionGuay agreed that Corbitt's frequency reports accurately represented the raw data and that Charlie Adelson was Donna Adelson's most frequent contact for the specified period, while maintaining that duplicate events affected totals.Open in transcript →
Quote“They represent the raw data accurately, correct.”— Kelsey GuayGuay agreed that the frequency reports accurately represented the underlying raw records.Open in transcript →
RedirectKelsey Guay - RedirectKelsey GuayJoshua D. Zelman2highlights18lines spoken

Summary

Guay explained that carrier records do not identify app-based calls and said Donna Adelson's phone had July 18 data sessions.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightGuay explained that third-party applications and FaceTime activity would appear only as data transactions, not as identified calls or messages in AT&T records.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quote“So AT&T does show data transactions, but it's not going to show, like, a FaceTime audio or, you know, an email.”— Kelsey GuayExplains the defense expert's limitation on what carrier records can identify.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶