Skip to content
personpersonDonna AdelsonDonna AdelsonMother of Charlie and Wendi Adelson, discussed across three earlier Dan Markel murder proceedings and convicted on all three counts as the defendant in the 2025 Donna Adelson trial.← All People
Defendant

Donna Adelson

Courtroom still of Donna Adelson.

Mother of Charlie and Wendi Adelson, discussed across three earlier Dan Markel murder proceedings and convicted on all three counts as the defendant in the 2025 Donna Adelson trial.

1,883 lines·197 proceedings·189 mentions·4 trials

About

Donna Adelson, the mother of Wendi and Charlie Adelson, first entered the litigation through family emails, phone evidence, and recordings rather than live testimony. The record included a 2016 undercover encounter outside the Adelson Institute, where an agent gave her a flyer containing a phone number and a $5,000 demand and recorded the contact, followed by her call to the undercover line and other family communications. Courts admitted recordings arising from that operation; the 2019 court limited emails exchanged with Wendi to showing state of mind, while later proceedings addressed a Crawford objection and competing interpretations of Charlie Adelson’s recorded language with his mother. In 2025, Donna Adelson stood trial on first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation charges. The State argued that she joined a murder-for-hire conspiracy arising from Wendi’s relocation dispute and relied on family communications, alleged payments, phone and surveillance evidence, recordings, travel preparations, and allegations that she sought false testimony. The defense denied that she planned, solicited, or financed the killing and challenged the inferences drawn from that evidence. Adelson did not testify, and the jury found her guilty on all three counts.

Trial Record (197)

GMGarcia–MagbanuaSep 26, 2019 – Oct 11, 2019

Emails, phone and workplace records, and recorded communications following an FBI undercover contact placed Donna Adelson in the trial evidence. The court limited emails involving her to showing the speakers' state of mind rather than the truth of their contents.

Day 1

Day 2

Day 5

Day 6

ProceduralGang-Expert, Wiretap, and Dolce Vita RulingsMentioned

Summary

The court deferred the gang-expert decision, set a process for individual wiretap rulings, allowed the Dolce Vita undercover conversation subject to transcript foundation, and ordered wiretap materials shared before Monday.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 7

Day 8

Day 10

KMMagbanua RetrialMay 18, 2022 – May 27, 2022

Appearing through recorded evidence rather than live testimony, Donna Adelson was heard in an undercover encounter and calls introduced by FBI agents on Days 5 and 6; the court denied a defense challenge to certain calls on the stated non-hearsay basis.

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Day 5

ProceduralPre-Testimony Motions: Exhibit 100 Ruling and Crawford Challenge to Adelson Wiretaps1highlightMentioned

Summary

The court admitted Exhibit 100 and denied the defense's Crawford challenge to Adelson wiretap calls.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

rulingThe court rejected the renewed Crawford challenge, adhering to its ruling that the Adelson wiretap calls were not admitted for their truth and therefore lacked Confrontation Clause protection.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
DirectOscar Jimenez Jr. - DirectOscar Jimenez Jr.Georgia Cappleman1highlightMentioned2lines spoken

Summary

FBI agent Oscar Jimenez Jr. described an undercover encounter with Donna Adelson; the court admitted the flyer and recordings of that encounter.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

Quote“I was trying to get Mrs. Adelson on the phone and also the purpose -- to tickle the wire.”— Oscar Jimenez Jr.States the stated purpose of the call to the Adelson Institute.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
DirectPatrick Sanford - Direct (Part 1)Patrick SanfordGeorgia Cappleman1highlightMentioned116lines spoken

Summary

FBI agent Patrick Sanford described investigative follow-up, surveillance, and wiretap calls involving the Adelsons and Katherine Magbanua; the court admitted State's Exhibits 99 and 53.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

Quote“No, they were not. We scrubbed those records thoroughly. I passed the numbers to the DEA and ATF, those case agents, and thoroughly went over it with them to find any connections between any of the parties.”— Patrick SanfordSanford described the scope of investigators' review when addressing whether the wiretap showed Adelson-family communications with Latin King members.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 6

DirectPatrick Sanford - Direct (Part 2)Patrick SanfordGeorgia Cappleman1highlightMentioned143lines spoken

Summary

Sanford described undercover recordings, the admitted letter used to prompt contact, and phone evidence; he testified that Magbanua had not called the undercover number and later used a burner phone.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

Day 7

Day 8

CACharlie AdelsonOct 26, 2023 – Nov 6, 2023

Recorded calls involving Donna Adelson were introduced through law-enforcement witnesses, including evidence from the 2016 undercover contact. Charles Adelson's later cross-examination addressed competing interpretations of his conversations with her after that contact.

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

DirectOscar Jimenez Jr. - DirectOscar Jimenez Jr.Georgia Cappleman1highlightMentioned

Summary

FBI agent Oscar Jimenez Jr. authenticated the undercover contact, recordings, and call materials involving Donna Adelson; the court admitted the related State exhibits.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

Quote“So the cell number right there is my undercover or covert phone number, and the $5,000 was what was expected to be received from Ms. Donna Adelson.”— Oscar Jimenez Jr.Jimenez identified the contact number and requested amount appearing on the flyer.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 5

DirectPatrick Sanford - Direct (Recall, Continued)Patrick SanfordGeorgia Cappleman2highlightsMentioned374lines spoken

Summary

Sanford continued explaining undercover recordings and call sequences; the court admitted key exhibits, addressed a foundation objection, and replayed audio to clarify a disputed reference.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (2)

Quote“So this is my problem. You approached me on Alton Road. You handed me an article from the newspaper about my ex-son-in-law. You told me I need to call you and help your friend who is in prison. Now at the time you did that, I didn't understand what you were talking about. I didn't call you back. Then you mail me a threatening letter. Then you send me a text message to my phone that says I'm not taking you seriously. So I am taking you seriously. And I really want you to listen to me.”— Donna AdelsonThe recorded call set out Donna Adelson's response to the undercover contacts and messages.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 6

Day 7

CrossCharlie Adelson - CrossCharlie AdelsonGeorgia Cappleman1highlightMentioned12lines spoken

Summary

Cappleman challenged Adelson's extortion account through his relationship with Magbanua, recorded calls, and his earlier silence; Adelson denied involvement in Dan Markel's murder.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

evidence eventThe State played Dolce recordings and questioned Adelson about statements concerning evidence, the police investigation, and the possibility of others being connected to the murder.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 8

DADonna AdelsonAug 22, 2025 – Sep 4, 2025

Donna Adelson stood trial on first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation charges as the State alleged that she joined a murder-for-hire conspiracy arising from her daughter's relocation dispute. The defense denied that she planned, solicited, or financed the killing, but the jury found her guilty on all three counts.

Day 1

Jury InstructionPreliminary Jury Instructions — Charges, Trial Procedure, and Juror Conduct1highlightMentioned2lines spoken

Summary

The court instructed jurors on the charges, the State's burden of proof, the defendant's right to remain silent, and restrictions on outside research and communication.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

rulingThe court preserved a limited opportunity for the defense to proffer questions for Wendi Adelson after her court testimony, outside the jury's presence, concerning matters that would not infringe on her asserted right.Open in transcript →
OpeningOpening Statement - Sarah Kathryn DuganSarah Kathryn Dugan3highlightsMentioned

Summary

The State previewed an alleged murder-for-hire conspiracy, connecting Donna Adelson to a custody-dispute motive, alleged intermediaries, records, recordings, and alleged post-crime conduct.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (3)

evidence eventThe State previewed expected digital, surveillance, and financial evidence intended to connect alleged shooters, Katherine Magbanua, Charlie Adelson, and Donna Adelson.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 2

DirectJason Newlin - DirectJason NewlinGeorgia Cappleman1highlightMentioned

Summary

Newlin's proffer addressed the foundation for the 'Grandma Motion' tab and related emails in State's Exhibit 60.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

evidence eventNewlin testified in the proffer that December 2013 emails containing the allegations later included in the motion were forwarded to Donna Adelson, while he could not determine that she received the filed motion itself.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 3

Day 4

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

ProceduralDefense Motion for Judgment of Acquittal on Counts 1 and 31highlightMentioned

Summary

The court denied the defense request for judgment of acquittal on Counts 1 and 3 after hearing competing arguments over the sufficiency of the State's evidence.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

procedural actionDefense moved for judgment of acquittal on Counts 1 and 3, arguing the evidence did not show that Donna Adelson intended, encouraged, or solicited Daniel Markel's murder.Open in transcript →

Day 8

Day 9

ProceduralJury Instruction Colloquy — Lesser-Included Waiver, Calendar Rule-of-Completeness Ruling, Renewed JOA1highlight4lines spoken

Summary

Donna Adelson waived lesser-included offenses on Count 1; the court denied additional calendar evidence and the renewed motion for judgment of acquittal.

Highlights (1)

VerdictVerdictMentioned3lines spoken

Summary

The jury returned guilty verdicts on all three counts, confirmed unanimously by polling; the court adjudicated Donna Adelson guilty and set sentencing proceedings.

Mentioned in this proceeding.