Skip to content
Donna Adelson trial-day trial-day Georgia CapplemanSarah Kathryn DuganJackie L. FulfordJoshua D. ZelmanCraig IsomDavid SimsAnthony ClarkJoanne MalteseJames GeigerLuis Riverajury_instructionsopening_statementdirectcrossredirectDay 1 - August 22, 2025 Opening statements frame the trial's central dispute: the prosecution traces a conspiracy chain from Donna Adelson's documented obsession with relocating her grandchildren to a murder-for-hire, while the defense concedes the chain through Charlie Adelson but argues the evidence stops there. Cooperating hitman Luis Rivera provides a first-person account of the July 18, 2014 murder and describes a custody motive, then on cross acknowledges Donna and Harvey Adelson were not part of the chain as far as he knew.
Donna Adelson Day 2 →

Day 1 - August 22, 2025

Opening Statements and First Witnesses

Judge Stephen S. Everett
17 Proceedings
8 Pages
6 Witnesses
2,440 Lines
Day 1 of 9
Appearing:

Opening statements frame the trial's central dispute: the prosecution traces a conspiracy chain from Donna Adelson's documented obsession with relocating her grandchildren to a murder-for-hire, while the defense concedes the chain through Charlie Adelson but argues the evidence stops there. Cooperating hitman Luis Rivera provides a first-person account of the July 18, 2014 murder and describes a custody motive, then on cross acknowledges Donna and Harvey Adelson were not part of the chain as far as he knew.

Full day summary

Day 1 opened with Judge Everett delivering preliminary jury instructions, reading the three charges — first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation — and instructing the panel that the indictment carries no evidentiary weight and that no adverse inference may be drawn from Donna Adelson's decision not to testify. Assistant State Attorney Sarah Kathryn Dugan delivered the prosecution's opening statement. She framed Donna Adelson as a controlling matriarch whose documented hostility toward Dan Markel and fixation on relocating Wendi and the grandchildren from Tallahassee to Miami provided the motive for his murder. Dugan traced an alleged communication chain — Donna to Charlie to Katherine Magbanua to Sigfredo Garcia — noting the absence of direct contact between chain endpoints as evidence of deliberate insulation. She previewed a 2016 FBI undercover operation in which Donna received a blackmail note referencing the murder, pocketed it without reading it, and immediately called Charlie; the resulting wiretapped calls were anticipated by law enforcement. Dugan also described FBI restaurant surveillance in which Charlie Adelson discussed paying to kill the blackmailer and referenced the original plot. She closed with Donna's attempt to flee to Vietnam within hours of Charlie's November 2023 conviction and alleged bribery of jailhouse informants, including a handwritten Q&A script Donna composed for false testimony. Defense co-counsel Jackie Fulford opened by acknowledging Dan Markel as a devoted father before making a strategic concession: the state could prove Garcia shot Markel, Rivera drove and supplied the weapon, Magbanua arranged the contract, and Charlie Adelson paid approximately $130,000–$138,000 from his safe the day after the murder. Fulford's central argument was that the evidentiary chain ends there. She characterized the prosecution's case against Donna as eleven years of media-amplified theory — including true-crime specials acknowledged by jurors during voir dire — rather than proof connecting Donna to the planning, ordering, or financing of the murder. She contested the financial payment narrative as Charlie's money and argued the relocation motive had been legally extinguished when the final divorce judgment denied relocation with prejudice on July 31, 2013, more than a year before the shooting. The state called five witnesses to establish the crime scene and cause of death. Neighbor James Geiger described hearing a loud bang, observing a light-colored Prius rapidly backing out of Markel's driveway, and returning minutes later to find Markel's bloody head slowly rolling in the driver's seat. The defense waived cross-examination of Geiger, first-responding TPD Sergeant David Sims, forensic specialist Joanne Maltese, and medical examiner Dr. Anthony Clark. Sims described Markel slumped and making a gasping sucking sound when he arrived. Maltese confirmed no usable fingerprints were recovered, Markel's wallet remained untouched in the glove box, and stippling on his forearm indicated close-range discharge. Dr. Clark reconstructed two shots: the first through the closed car window caused non-fatal wounds with extensive glass pseudo-stippling; the second, fired at inches from Markel's forehead while his arm was raised in a defensive reaction, was not survivable. Clark's formal findings were cause of death: gunshot wounds of the face and head; manner of death: homicide. Following the medical examiner's testimony, Judge Everett addressed Donna Adelson directly on the record, instructing her to control head movements, expressions of disagreement, and emotional outbursts during testimony, referencing a prior sidebar on the issue. Retired TPD lead detective Craig Isom provided the day's most extended testimony. He introduced emails from Donna Adelson's communications showing she called Markel a "major fucker" and described relocation as the most important goal of the divorce. Five days after a court permanently denied relocation, she proposed having the children fake church attendance as leverage and separately proposed a one-million-dollar bribe. Isom detailed gym and bus surveillance video establishing that a silver-green Prius waited through Markel's entire workout, followed him, and was captured fleeing before the 911 call — narrowing the murder window to approximately four minutes. The Save Gas rental contract admitted as State's Exhibit 67 named Luis Rivera as renter, with a brother phone number traced to Garcia. Isom described Magbanua's ghost employment at the Adelson Institute: checks began two months after the murder, ran for nearly two years, and every one was personally signed by Donna Adelson, with no job description, timesheet, or evidence of actual work. Within 20 minutes of Magbanua's October 2016 arrest, Charlie Adelson's attorney called Isom to arrange advance notice if Charlie were to be arrested. On cross, Isom conceded Donna received no identifiable financial benefit from Markel's estate and acknowledged multiple emails in State's Exhibit 64 were sent from the shared household account with Harvey Adelson's name displayed. The defense's sharpest moment was a TV-repair email signed "Love, Dad." Cappleman rehabilitated on redirect by walking through emails signed "Mom" — including one stating relocation was "the most important part of your divorce." The day closed with Luis Rivera, who pled guilty to second-degree murder and is serving a 19-year sentence. He described being recruited by Garcia, who received a contract through Magbanua, and understood the motive as a custody dispute: someone wanted Markel dead so a woman could have her children. Rivera had no contact with any Adelson family member. He described a June 2014 surveillance trip aborted because Markel had his children with him, and the July trip driven by intelligence — traced through Magbanua from Wendi Adelson — that Markel was leaving town. Rivera drove the Prius into Markel's driveway; Garcia shot Markel twice through the window; they fled in seconds. Payment of $35,000 arrived the next morning in an unusual format: $100 bills stapled into $1,000 bundles. On cross, Fulford walked Rivera through a deposition photo profile he had annotated, confirming he identified Wendi Adelson as the woman who wanted Markel dead and had placed X marks next to Donna and Harvey Adelson, ratifying his prior statement that as far as he knew they were not involved. The prosecution declined redirect, leaving both admissions before the jury to close the day.

Video thumbnail 8:11:29
Watch →

2. Opening Statements

Opening statements from both sides in the fourth and final Markel conspiracy trial, with the prosecution framing Donna Adelson as the controlling figure whose motive and financial reach drove the murder, and the defense conceding the guilt of prior defendants while arguing the evidentiary chain never reaches Donna.

Opening
Opening Statement - Sarah Kathryn Dugan Sarah Kathryn Dugan
187 lines

Prosecutor Dugan presents the state's theory that Donna Adelson orchestrated Dan Markel's 2014 murder-for-hire through a family chain — herself, son Charlie, girlfriend Magbanua, and hitmen Garcia and Rivera — driven by a bitter custody relocation dispute that courts had permanently denied.

Procedural
Brief Recess — Jury Break After Opening Statements
Opening
Opening Statement - Jackie L. Fulford Jackie L. Fulford
98 lines

Defense attorney Jackie Fulford concedes the murder chain through Garcia, Rivera, Magbanua, and Charlie Adelson while arguing the state has only theory and motive — not evidence — that Donna Adelson ordered or planned the killing.

Highlights

3. James Geiger — Direct/Cross

James Geiger, a nearly 50-year resident of Trescott Drive, testifies about the morning of July 18, 2014: hearing a loud pop, watching a light-colored Prius speed away from Markel's driveway, and finding Markel unresponsive in his car with the driver's side window shattered. Multiple exhibits are admitted and the 911 call is partially played. Defense waives cross-examination.

Direct
James Geiger Georgia Cappleman
141 lines

Next-door neighbor James Geiger testifies that he heard a loud bang, saw a light-colored Prius rapidly flee Markel's driveway, then found Markel alive but unresponsive in his running car with a shattered driver's side window and blood on his head; his 14-minute 911 call is partially played for the jury.

Cross
James Geiger Jackie L. Fulford
6 lines

Defense waives cross-examination of neighbor James Geiger; he is released from his subpoena without challenge.

5. Joanne Maltese — Direct/Cross

Retired TPD forensic specialist Joanne Maltese describes her July 18, 2014 crime scene response: no fingerprints of value recovered from the vehicle exterior, Markel's wallet found intact in the glove box, and stippling documented on his forearm at the hospital. The defense waived cross-examination.

Direct
Joanne Maltese Georgia Cappleman
150 lines

Retired TPD forensic specialist Joanne Maltese walks through the physical evidence she collected at Markel's crime scene and at the hospital, establishing no fingerprints of value, no robbery motive, glass consistent with a gunshot, and stippling on Markel's forearm indicating close-range fire.

Cross
Joanne Maltese Joshua D. Zelman
3 lines

Defense declines to cross-examine retired TPD forensic specialist Joanne Maltese; she is released without challenge.

6. Anthony Clark — Direct/Cross

Forensic pathologist Dr. Anthony Clark testifies to Dan Markel's autopsy findings — two gunshot wounds, defensive arm movement, cause and manner of death — before the defense waives cross-examination and Judge Everett instructs Donna Adelson to control her emotional reactions in front of the jury.

Direct
Anthony Clark Georgia Cappleman
135 lines

Medical examiner Dr. Anthony Clark testifies to performing Dan Markel's autopsy on July 19, 2014, establishing two gunshot wounds, a reconstructed shot sequence (first shot through the closed car window stunned Markel; second forehead shot was not survivable), close-range fire measured in inches, and a defensive arm raise indicating Markel was aware of the attack. Cause of death: gunshot wounds of the face and head. Manner of death: homicide.

Cross
Anthony Clark Joshua D. Zelman
4 lines

Defense waives cross-examination of medical examiner Dr. Anthony Clark; the judge dismisses him and grants the state's request for a lunch recess.

Procedural
Judge Everett Warns Donna Adelson to Control Emotional Reactions

Highlights

7. Craig Isom — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Contested admissibility rulings on composite email Exhibit 64 precede retired TPD detective Craig Isom's direct examination, in which he traces the motive evidence — Donna Adelson's emails about the relocation dispute and a proposed million-dollar bribe — alongside surveillance video and SunPass records placing Luis Rivera's rented Prius at the scene, and payroll checks from the Adelson Institute signed by Donna to Katherine Magbanua beginning two months after the murder. Defense cross-examination challenges email attribution through a shared account and disputes the "hatred" and "bribe" characterizations; redirect focuses on emails signed "Mom" to restore attribution.

Procedural
OJP — Contested Admissibility of Composite Email Exhibit 64
Direct
Craig Isom Georgia Cappleman
153 lines

Retired TPD lead detective Craig Isom establishes the ballistics stipulation, details his non-suspect approach of Wendi Adelson hours after the murder, introduces the contentious custody dispute as motive, and begins connecting Donna Adelson to the litigation record through emails — triggering a contested out-of-jury exhibit ruling over foundation.

Procedural
OJP — Foundation Objection to Exhibit 64-AA (Shared Email Address)
Direct
Craig Isom Georgia Cappleman
443 lines

Isom continues his direct covering Donna Adelson's hostile emails and million-dollar bribe proposal, gym and bus surveillance tracking the Prius hitmen on the morning of the murder, SunPass evidence linking the rental car to Luis Rivera, and the suspicious post-murder ghost-employment payments Donna personally signed to Katherine Magbanua — ending with Charlie Adelson's attorney calling police within 20 minutes of Magbanua's arrest.

Cross
Craig Isom Joshua D. Zelman
152 lines

Defense cross-examination of lead detective Craig Isom challenges email attribution in State's Exhibit 64 — walking Isom through multiple emails displaying Harvey Adelson as sender — extracts a concession that Donna received no financial benefit from Markel's death, and neutralizes the Charlie attorney phone call by confirming it was Charlie's lawyer, not Donna's, who called within minutes of Magbanua's arrest.

Redirect
Craig Isom Georgia Cappleman
23 lines

Brief prosecution redirect rehabilitating email attribution: Cappleman elicits from Isom that key emails from the shared Adelson account were signed 'Mom' — including a May 2013 message calling relocation the most important part of the divorce — directly countering the defense's cross-examination challenge that the shared-account emails were Harvey's.

Highlights

8. Luis Rivera — Direct/Cross

Cooperating co-defendant Luis Rivera testifies about the July 2014 shooting of Dan Markel — recruited by Sigfredo Garcia through Katherine Magbanua — and describes the $35,000 cash payment the morning after. On cross-examination, Rivera confirms he identified Wendi Adelson as the person who wanted Markel dead, while stating at his prior deposition that Donna Adelson and Harvey Adelson were, as far as he knew, not involved.

Procedural
OJP — Exhibit 60 Foundation Clarification
Direct
Luis Rivera Georgia Cappleman
487 lines

Cooperating hitman Luis Rivera testifies to the full murder-for-hire operation — two trips to Tallahassee, Sigfredo Garcia shooting Markel in his driveway while Rivera drove, Magbanua delivering $35,000 in unusually stapled cash — tracing the conspiracy chain from Garcia through Magbanua toward the unnamed family that wanted Markel's children.

Cross
Luis Rivera Jackie L. Fulford
98 lines

Defense attorney Fulford uses Rivera's own deposition annotations on Defendant's Exhibit 50 to extract two pivotal concessions: that Rivera understood Wendi Adelson as the person who wanted Markel killed, and that he personally marked Donna and Harvey Adelson as not involved in the conspiracy.

Highlights

Luis Rivera - Direct “That they wanted the kids.” — Luis Rivera Rivera's plain statement of the understood motive for the murder: Markel was killed so a woman could gain custody of her children. This is the prosecution's central motive theory delivered in the hitman's own words, without prompting from anyone in the Adelson family. Luis Rivera - Direct testimony highlight Rivera gives his account of the murder: he pulled the Prius directly behind Markel's car in the driveway; Garcia jumped out and shot Markel twice through the driver's window. They were in the driveway only seconds. Rivera confirms he chose not to be the shooter. Luis Rivera - Direct “Well, I pulled up right behind him and Garcia jumped out and shot him.” — Luis Rivera Rivera's flat, direct account of the murder: he was the driver, Garcia was the shooter. The brevity and matter-of-fact delivery is the first first-person description of the killing given to this jury. Luis Rivera - Cross testimony highlight Rivera identifies Wendi Adelson as 'the lady who wanted the man killed,' responding 'Absolutely' when asked if it was Wendi wanting her children — the defense's first direct evidentiary step toward its core theory. Luis Rivera - Cross “It was she wanting her children, correct? / Absolutely.” — Jackie L. Fulford / Luis Rivera Rivera confirms without qualification that the person who wanted Dan Markel dead — as relayed through the conspiracy chain — was Wendi Adelson, motivated by the custody dispute. Delivered by the prosecution's own cooperating hitman, this is the defense's clearest first-day statement of its core theory.
Donna Adelson Day 2 →