Day 2 - August 25, 2025
Foundation rulings on divorce-record evidence preceded testimony from Wendi and Robert Adelson and an officer who described a vehicle at a Trescott Drive roadblock.
Full day summary
9:00:282. Wendi Adelson — Direct/Cross/Redirect
Wendi Adelson testified under immunity about the divorce, failed relocation effort, family discussions, and the morning Dan Markel was killed, while denying knowledge of any plan to kill him.
Direct1336 lines
Wendi Adelson - Direct Wendi Adelson Georgia Cappleman
2 sidebars inside this proceeding
- Lunch Break TimingThe court discussed the estimated remaining time for direct and cross-examination before recessing for lunch.
- Children's Surname DocumentsThe parties discussed whether three admitted documents referring to the children as Adelson could be used to question the defendant about the children's name change.
Cross948 lines
Wendi Adelson - Cross Wendi Adelson Jackie L. Fulford
3 sidebars inside this proceeding
- Review of Prior TestimonyCounsel sought to locate prior testimony for possible use after the witness did not recall making the statement.
- Transcript Excerpt as DemonstrativeCounsel discussed using a brief transcript excerpt of earlier testimony as a demonstrative rather than admitting it for impeachment.
- Robert Adelson Testimony LimitsThe sidebar addressed the permitted scope of Robert Adelson's testimony after questioning about family contact and personality traits.
3. Robert Adelson — Direct/Cross
Robert Adelson testified about Donna Adelson's family role, statements concerning Wendi Adelson's divorce, and post-killing conversations. Defense questioning addressed his contact with Donna and advice relayed not to speak with police.
Direct510 lines
Robert Adelson - Direct Robert Adelson Sarah Kathryn Dugan
3 sidebars inside this proceeding
- Limits on Personality-Trait QuestioningThe parties disputed whether prior testimony or opening statements allowed questioning about whether she was gullible or simply followed directions.
- Limits on Plan TestimonyThe parties disputed whether testimony about a plan affecting Dan Markel's marriage was admissible for motive and as party-opponent or coconspirator statements.
- Secret Boyfriend StatementCounsel disputed whether a statement about a secret boyfriend could be used to show its effect on a witness and an asserted effort to direct suspicion toward Jeff Lacasse.