Skip to content
personpersonGeorgia CapplemanGeorgia CapplemanChief Assistant State Attorney Georgia Cappleman, lead prosecutor for the State of Florida in all four Dan Markel murder-for-hire trials.← All People
ProsecutionState Attorney's Office

Georgia Cappleman

Courtroom still of Georgia Cappleman.

Chief Assistant State Attorney Georgia Cappleman, lead prosecutor for the State of Florida in all four Dan Markel murder-for-hire trials.

15,990 lines·421 proceedings·2 mentions·4 trials

About

Georgia Cappleman was a lead prosecutor in the related trials of Sigfredo Garcia, Katherine Magbanua, Charlie Adelson, and Donna Adelson. In the 2019 joint trial, she opened with the State's allegation that Magbanua connected the Adelsons to Garcia and Luis Rivera. Her examinations traced the suspect Prius, phone contacts, cash, and the 2016 undercover calls, while her cross-examination pressed Magbanua on the Dolce Vita recording, deposits, and changes in phone use. Garcia was convicted of murder and conspiracy but acquitted of solicitation; jurors deadlocked on all three counts against Magbanua, and Judge Hankinson declared a mistrial.

At Magbanua's retrial, Cappleman returned to Rivera's account and the records the State said corroborated it, then argued the State's theory in closing and rebuttal. In Charlie Adelson's trial, she cross-examined him about his extortion explanation, continued payments and contact with Magbanua, and why he had not reported the alleged threat. At Donna Adelson's trial, she elicited testimony about payroll checks and recorded calls, tested defense witnesses' alternative accounts, and argued that family communications, payments, documents, and travel preparations supported the State's conspiracy theory. Later juries found Magbanua guilty on all three counts in 2022, Charlie Adelson guilty on all three in 2023, and Donna Adelson guilty on all three in 2025.

Trial Record (421)

GMGarcia–MagbanuaSep 26, 2019 – Oct 11, 2019

Georgia Cappleman led the prosecution's case by presenting the alleged murder-for-hire theory through forensic, surveillance, travel, phone, financial, cooperating-witness, and undercover-recording evidence. She directly challenged Katherine Magbanua's explanations and closed by asking jurors to consider the evidence together under the court's instructions rather than as isolated items.

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

Day 9

Day 10

ClosingClosing Argument - Georgia CapplemanGeorgia Cappleman3highlights27lines spoken

Summary

The State argued that corroborating records and testimony tied both defendants to an alleged murder-for-hire conspiracy and requested guilty verdicts.

Highlights (3)

evidence eventCappleman synthesized the phone, GPS, rental, and toll evidence to argue that it corroborated the June and July Tallahassee trips, the homicide-day timeline, and the alleged payment meeting.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
RebuttalRebuttal Closing - Georgia CapplemanGeorgia Cappleman3highlights6lines spoken

Summary

Cappleman rebutted defense arguments, emphasized the State's claimed corroborating evidence, and asked jurors to convict both defendants.

Highlights (3)

procedural actionCappleman rebutted the defense characterization of the investigation, describing extensive surveillance, records analysis, searches, and surveillance authorization.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
testimony highlightCappleman challenged the defense attack on Rivera, arguing that his inconsistencies were natural and that his account matched other evidence; she acknowledged jurors must decide credibility.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 11

KMMagbanua RetrialMay 18, 2022 – May 27, 2022

Georgia Cappleman led the prosecution's witness examinations and closing arguments, developing the State's presentation through scene, autopsy, rental-car, phone, financial, recorded-call, and cooperating-witness evidence. In closing and rebuttal, she argued that Magbanua linked the Adelsons to Garcia and Rivera, addressed challenges to Rivera's reliability and Magbanua's account, and asked jurors to apply the principal-liability and reasonable-doubt instructions.

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

ClosingClosing Argument - Georgia CapplemanGeorgia Cappleman3highlights18lines spoken

Summary

The State argued that phone, financial, rental-car, witness, and recorded-call evidence showed Magbanua acted as an intermediary in the alleged murder-for-hire conspiracy and asked for guilty verdicts on all charges.

Highlights (3)

procedural actionCappleman connected the State's theory to the principal-liability and reasonable-doubt instructions, arguing that the jury should reject speculation not supported by evidence.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
RebuttalRebuttal Closing - Georgia CapplemanGeorgia Cappleman2highlights3lines spoken

Summary

Cappleman urged jurors to rely on admitted evidence, reject the defense's coincidence theory, and find Katherine Magbanua guilty.

Highlights (2)

procedural actionIn rebuttal, Cappleman argued that jurors should decide the case from admitted evidence and the elements of the offenses, rather than speculate about material excluded from evidence.Open in transcript →
otherCappleman argued that the defense account required multiple coincidences, pointing to rental-car activity, a cash increase, employment after the killing, Rivera's testimony, and the relationships among Magbanua, Garcia, and Charlie Adelson.Open in transcript →
CACharlie AdelsonOct 26, 2023 – Nov 6, 2023

Georgia Cappleman led the State's presentation and cross-examined Charlie Adelson on his claim that payments and continued contact with Katherine Magbanua resulted from extortion. In closing and rebuttal, she tied the witness, financial, travel, communications, and recorded-call evidence to the State's murder-conspiracy theory and asked for guilty verdicts.

Day 1

Day 2

ProceduralLunch Recess3lines spoken

Summary

The court recessed for lunch, reminded defense counsel to keep future proffers from being overheard, and then resumed the State's case.

Day 3

Day 4

sidebarLengthy Witness Schedule4lines spoken

Summary

The parties discussed ending early during a lengthy recordings witness and allowing the defense time afterward to consult with its client about whether he would testify.

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

CrossCharlie Adelson - CrossCharlie AdelsonGeorgia Cappleman1highlight623lines spoken

Summary

Cappleman challenged Adelson's extortion account through his relationship with Magbanua, recorded calls, and his earlier silence; Adelson denied involvement in Dan Markel's murder.

Highlights (1)

confrontationCappleman pressed Adelson on the difference between what he said he believed in 2014 and his current claim that Katherine Magbanua and possibly Sigfredo Garcia extorted him.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 8

DADonna AdelsonAug 22, 2025 – Sep 4, 2025

Georgia Cappleman led the prosecution's examinations and delivered its closing and rebuttal arguments, using family communications, financial records, cooperating-witness accounts, surveillance, and recorded calls to present the State's alleged conspiracy theory. Her closing drew a defense burden-shifting objection, which the court overruled while reaffirming that Donna Adelson had no burden and later cautioning against comments on silence.

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

sidebarReported Juror Contact Concerns4lines spoken

Summary

Counsel disclosed an anonymous report about a possible jury-selection restroom conversation and asked about jurors and audience members sharing break areas, with no specific improper contact identified.

Day 4

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

Day 9

ClosingClosing Argument - Georgia CapplemanGeorgia Cappleman1highlight27lines spoken

Summary

Cappleman argued that the evidence tied Donna Adelson to an alleged murder-for-hire conspiracy; the court overruled a defense objection about burden shifting and the right to remain silent.

Highlights (1)

ClosingClosing Argument - Georgia Cappleman (Resumed)Georgia Cappleman3highlights6lines spoken

Summary

Cappleman argued that recordings, documents, and alleged travel preparations undermined the extortion account and supported the State’s conspiracy theory.

Highlights (3)

testimony highlightCappleman argued that the alleged response to the undercover “bump,” including recorded contacts and actions involving Charlie Adelson and Katherine Magbanua, conflicted with the defense account of a prior extortion scheme.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
procedural actionCappleman argued that the Vietnam travel preparations and one-way ticket supported an inference that Donna Adelson was attempting to flee, then asked jurors to find her guilty.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quote“The primary risk of a conspiracy is that you are doing it with other people, right? You can get caught. Somebody can squeal. Somebody could give you up.”— Georgia CapplemanCappleman used this analogy to explain the State's claimed structure of the alleged conspiracy.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
RebuttalRebuttal Closing - Georgia CapplemanGeorgia Cappleman2highlights4lines spoken

Summary

Cappleman rebutted defense themes, urging jurors to weigh the text, financial, and family-communication evidence together and reject the extortion account.

Highlights (2)

Quote“Everyone that's responsible for this murder should be held accountable for their role, not just Charlie, not just the two killers that came here and shot him.”— Georgia CapplemanCappleman framed the State’s theory as one of individual accountability for every alleged participant.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
RebuttalRebuttal Closing - Georgia Cappleman (Resumed)Georgia Cappleman3highlights2lines spoken

Summary

Cappleman completed the State's rebuttal and asked for guilty verdicts; the court then instructed jurors and sent the case to deliberations.

Highlights (3)

confrontationIn her resumed rebuttal, Cappleman argued that Donna Adelson's conduct on recorded calls, internet searches, cash discussion, and family communications contradicted the defense extortion account and supported the State's alleged conspiracy theory.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
procedural actionCappleman ended by asking jurors to find Donna Adelson guilty, arguing that check payments, a script, and the statement that the matter involved two people showed her alleged involvement.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quote“She wanted it done. She brought the money. She stroked the checks.”— Georgia CapplemanCappleman used this as her final summary of the State's allegation that Donna Adelson participated in the conspiracy.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
VerdictVerdict8lines spoken

Summary

The jury returned guilty verdicts on all three counts, confirmed unanimously by polling; the court adjudicated Donna Adelson guilty and set sentencing proceedings.