Skip to content
Dan Markel— Case Archive
personpersonAndrew BrownAndrew BrownStarMetro employee who authenticated July 18, 2014 bus footage.← All People
Witness

Andrew Brown

Courtroom still of Andrew Brown.

StarMetro employee who authenticated July 18, 2014 bus footage.

AppearedGarcia–Magbanua
81 lines·5 proceedings

About

On Day 1, StarMetro employee Andrew Brown established how cameras on city buses operated and retained footage. He testified that the cameras on buses 505 and 707 were working on July 18, 2014, and identified State's Exhibit 125 as fair and accurate copies of images collected from those buses. The court admitted that exhibit without objection.

Defense questioning focused on the Prius footage and the version played for the jury. Brown described two occupants, including a passenger in a white shirt visible for roughly five to ten seconds, but said the video did not clearly show identifying features of either occupant. He agreed that the displayed version was not the original because separate videos had been combined and circles or highlights were added. Defense counsel requested a Richardson hearing concerning the enhanced video; the court reserved the issue pending the next witness's testimony.

The State later recalled Brown to identify State's Exhibit 173 as full footage from the two buses without circles or smaller clips. During voir dire, he testified that he watched the footage being transferred to the thumb drive and was certain it matched the footage StarMetro provided in 2014. The court admitted Exhibit 173 without objection.

Trial Record (5)

GMGarcia–MagbanuaSep 26, 2019 – Oct 11, 2019Called by prosecution

On Day 1, StarMetro employee Andrew Brown authenticated bus-camera footage and later identified a full, unannotated version of that footage. Cross-examination addressed the limited identifying detail in the Prius video and the edits added to the version shown to the jury.

Day 1

CrossAndrew Brown - CrossAndrew BrownSaam Zangeneh4highlights48lines spoken

Summary

Brown described limited visibility of Prius occupants and said the jury video was an altered, annotated version; the court reserved on a defense discovery objection.

Highlights (4)

testimony highlightBrown testified that the bus footage showed two occupants in the Prius but did not allow him to see the driver clearly, the back seat, the passenger's face, or other identifying details.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
evidence eventBrown said the video shown to the jury was not the original footage; it had been combined from separate videos and included circles or highlights around the vehicle.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
DirectAndrew Brown - Direct (Recall)Andrew BrownGeorgia Cappleman1highlight5lines spoken

Summary

Brown authenticated unannotated original bus footage as the State sought to admit Exhibit 173; defense requested voir dire.

Highlights (1)

evidence eventAfter Brown confirmed that the thumb drive contained the full original footage from the two buses without circles, the State requested admission of State's Exhibit 173; defense counsel requested voir dire before any ruling appears in this proceeding.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶