Skip to content
personpersonSaam ZangenehSaam ZangenehDefense attorney who served as lead counsel for Sigfredo Garcia at the Garcia–Magbanua 2019 Joint Trial.← All People
Defense· Defense team (Garcia)

Saam Zangeneh

Courtroom still of Saam Zangeneh.

Defense attorney who served as lead counsel for Sigfredo Garcia at the Garcia–Magbanua 2019 Joint Trial.

4,325 lines·145 proceedings

About

Led Sigfredo Garcia's defense in the joint trial, appearing in procedural matters, witness examinations, jury-question follow-up, final-instruction discussion, and the closing argument.

His questioning tested several parts of the State's evidence. He examined Agent Patrick Sanford about how an FBI recording transcript was prepared, including efforts to reduce background noise and the absence of known peer-review or comparison information. He also questioned Detective Jonathan Grossman about the Prius rental agreement, changes in the vehicle's appearance, and what investigators did and did not observe or measure during inspections.

In closing, he argued that the case against Garcia depended on Luis Rivera, whose criminal background, prior statements, and plea benefits he presented as grounds for challenge. He disputed the State's claimed corroboration from traffic, rental, surveillance, cell-phone, financial, and ballistic evidence, offered alternative explanations, and asked jurors to find that the State had not proved Garcia's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Attorney insights (6)

Garcia–Magbanua42
Focus

Questioned Jonathan Grossman about the Prius rental agreement, vehicle inspections, and the unmeasured apparent bullet hole.

Supporting record (1)
Focus

In closing, argued that the State had not proved Garcia's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and challenged the claimed corroboration from traffic, rental, surveillance, cell-phone, financial, and ballistic evidence.

Supporting record (1)
Credibility challenge

Argued that Luis Rivera was unreliable because of his criminal background, prior statements, and plea benefits.

Supporting record (1)
Credibility challenge

Questioned Agent Patrick Sanford about background-noise reduction, his transcript preparation, prior state-court testimony, and his knowledge of peer review or technology comparisons.

Supporting record (1)

Trial Record (145)

GMGarcia–MagbanuaSep 26, 2019 – Oct 11, 2019

Led Sigfredo Garcia's defense through witness examinations, procedural matters, and closing argument. He challenged Rivera's reliability and the State's claimed corroboration while arguing that the evidence did not prove Garcia's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Day 1

sidebarOriginal Bus Footage

Summary

The prosecutor sought to recall Mr. Brown to introduce the original bus footage after concerns were raised about alterations to the admitted disk.

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

Day 9

Day 10

ClosingClosing Argument - Saam ZangenehSaam Zangeneh6highlights11lines spoken

Summary

Zangeneh attacked Luis Rivera's credibility, disputed the State's corroborating evidence, and urged acquittal based on reasonable doubt.

Highlights (6)

confrontationZangeneh frames the defense closing around attacking Luis Rivera's reliability, criminal history, prior statements, and plea benefits.Open in transcript →
Quote“He's the only person that tells you what he believes happened that day, the only one.”— Saam ZangenehZangeneh identifies Rivera's testimony as the central target of the defense closing.Open in transcript →
Show all 6 highlights
Quote“There's no direct evidence of my client at the murder scene other than Luis Rivera, and I believe that we've made our position on him very clear.”— Saam ZangenehThe defense summarizes its argument that the State lacked corroboration independent of Rivera.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 11