Cross-examined trial witnesses, including David Sims, Thomas Balboni, Keith Leland, and Mary Hull.
Saam Zangeneh

Defense attorney who served as lead counsel for Sigfredo Garcia at the Garcia–Magbanua 2019 Joint Trial.
About
Led Sigfredo Garcia's defense in the joint trial, appearing in procedural matters, witness examinations, jury-question follow-up, final-instruction discussion, and the closing argument.
His questioning tested several parts of the State's evidence. He examined Agent Patrick Sanford about how an FBI recording transcript was prepared, including efforts to reduce background noise and the absence of known peer-review or comparison information. He also questioned Detective Jonathan Grossman about the Prius rental agreement, changes in the vehicle's appearance, and what investigators did and did not observe or measure during inspections.
In closing, he argued that the case against Garcia depended on Luis Rivera, whose criminal background, prior statements, and plea benefits he presented as grounds for challenge. He disputed the State's claimed corroboration from traffic, rental, surveillance, cell-phone, financial, and ballistic evidence, offered alternative explanations, and asked jurors to find that the State had not proved Garcia's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Attorney insights (6)
Garcia–Magbanua42
Questioned Patrick Sanford about the methods and support for an FBI recording transcript.
Supporting record (1)
Questioned Jonathan Grossman about the Prius rental agreement, vehicle inspections, and the unmeasured apparent bullet hole.
Supporting record (1)
In closing, argued that the State had not proved Garcia's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and challenged the claimed corroboration from traffic, rental, surveillance, cell-phone, financial, and ballistic evidence.
Supporting record (1)
Argued that Luis Rivera was unreliable because of his criminal background, prior statements, and plea benefits.
Supporting record (1)
Questioned Agent Patrick Sanford about background-noise reduction, his transcript preparation, prior state-court testimony, and his knowledge of peer review or technology comparisons.
Supporting record (1)
Trial Record (145)
Led Sigfredo Garcia's defense through witness examinations, procedural matters, and closing argument. He challenged Rivera's reliability and the State's claimed corroboration while arguing that the evidence did not prove Garcia's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
Day 8
Day 9
Day 10
Day 11
No proceedings match this filter.