Skip to content
personpersonStephen LutesStephen LutesJPMorgan Chase security specialist who authenticated ATM footage of a silver Prius, while stressing it could not show whether the transaction was a deposit or withdrawal.← All People
Witness

Stephen Lutes

Courtroom still of Stephen Lutes.

JPMorgan Chase security specialist who authenticated ATM footage of a silver Prius, while stressing it could not show whether the transaction was a deposit or withdrawal.

71 lines·2 proceedings

About

Stephen Lutes, a JPMorgan Chase regional security specialist, described the camera system at a Pembroke Pines drive-up ATM and the bank's storage of its surveillance footage. He explained that separate cameras captured facial images and vehicles, and that the footage was stored on a bank DVR in a locked, alarmed technology room.

Lutes authenticated State's Exhibit 143 as an unaltered surveillance video from July 18, 2014. The court admitted the video and State's Exhibits 38 through 44, still images taken from it, without objection. The video was later shown in open court without audio.

On cross-examination, Lutes acknowledged that the footage could not identify whether the apparent transaction was a deposit or withdrawal, show where the vehicle had been immediately before or after the recorded interval, or confirm whether other camera coverage existed at the location. He said the bank's subpoena compliance unit supplied the video and photographs and that he had not independently investigated the transaction.

Trial Record (2)

GMGarcia–MagbanuaSep 26, 2019 – Oct 11, 2019Called by prosecution

Stephen Lutes, a JPMorgan Chase security specialist, authenticated ATM surveillance video and related still images admitted into evidence. Cross-examination addressed the limits of the footage and his role in the bank's subpoena response.

Day 3

CrossStephen Lutes - CrossStephen LutesSaam Zangeneh4highlights48lines spoken

Summary

Lutes said the ATM video showed an apparent transaction but could not identify its type or the vehicle's movements beyond the recorded footage.

Highlights (4)

testimony highlightLutes said the ATM video and stills could not show whether the driver made a deposit or withdrawal because the camera primarily captured facial identification and the driver's arm near the machine.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quote“It's different -- it's difficult to say. Because of the way the camera is positioned, it's geared more for getting facial identification of a customer. So, really, you just see the person's arm reach to the vicinity of the machine. So it's difficult to say what -- you can't -- you can't always tell what kind of transaction it was just based from the video or the pictures.”— Stephen LutesExplains the surveillance video's limit in identifying the ATM transaction.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶