Skip to content
personpersonWilliam KornegayWilliam KornegayTallahassee forensic specialist who searched the crime scene for prints and casings and received two projectiles recovered during Dan Markel's autopsy.← All People
Expert witness

William Kornegay

Courtroom still of William Kornegay.

Tallahassee forensic specialist who searched the crime scene for prints and casings and received two projectiles recovered during Dan Markel's autopsy.

32 lines·2 proceedings·1 mention

About

Called by the State during a single direct examination on day one, Kornegay identified himself on the record as a forensic specialist with the City of Tallahassee with 24 years at the department. He described arriving at the Trescott Drive scene around noon on July 18, 2014, near the end of the ongoing forensic examination, to assist Joanne Maltese in processing the vehicle in the garage for latent fingerprints and to conduct an eye search of the surrounding area.

His account of the scene work produced two negative results: no usable latent fingerprints from the vehicle, and no shell casings located anywhere in the yard, driveway, or garage. Asked why casings might be absent, he gave two explanations — that a revolver retains its casings until they are manually ejected, and that a semi-automatic can malfunction and fail to eject. Cappleman then offered a third possibility, that someone could have picked the casings up, and Kornegay confirmed all three as consistent with what he found.

He also testified that he attended Markel's autopsy and received two bullet projectiles removed from the body by Dr. Clark. Those items were admitted into evidence as Exhibits 167 and 168 without objection from either defense team. Neither Garcia's nor Magbanua's counsel conducted cross-examination, so his testimony closed after direct with no impeachment topic, bias inquiry, or contradiction raised on the record.

His name recurred later in the trial through another witness's testimony describing the autopsy, where he and Investigator Scott Cherry were identified as the investigators present who discussed the wound trajectories through the body so that the report reader would have that information.

Trial Record (2)

GMGarcia–MagbanuaSep 26, 2019 – Oct 11, 2019Called by prosecution

Testified for the State on trial day one as the Tallahassee Police forensic specialist who processed the Trescott Drive scene for latent prints and shell casings and received the projectiles recovered at Dan Markel's autopsy.

Day 1

DirectWilliam KornegayGeorgia Cappleman3highlights32lines spoken

Summary

TPD forensic specialist William Kornegay confirmed no fingerprints or shell casings were found at the Trescott Drive crime scene, explained the three reasons casings might be absent, and authenticated two bullet projectiles recovered from Markel's body at autopsy, admitted as Exhibits 167 and 168 without objection.

Highlights (3)

testimony highlightKornegay confirmed no shell casings were found and explained the three reasons casings might be absent: a revolver does not automatically eject, a semi-automatic can malfunction, or someone collected them from the scene.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quote“Could be — it could be a revolver. It could be a semi-automatic that could malfunction.”— William KornegayKornegay's enumeration of why no shell casings were found frames the weapon-type question for the jury, leaving open whether the shooter used a revolver — which would not automatically eject casings — or whether a semi-automatic misfired.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
evidence eventBullet projectiles recovered from Markel's body by Dr. Clark at autopsy were authenticated by Kornegay and admitted as Exhibits 167 and 168 without objection from either defense team.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
CrossAnthony ClarkMauricio PadillaMentioned

Summary

Padilla's cross of medical examiner Clark drew out that TPD forensic supervisor Shawn Yao visited Clark's office and called him by phone just weeks before trial to discuss wound trajectories — at a time when Yao had not yet read the autopsy report finalized five years earlier.

Mentioned in this proceeding.