Skip to content

Incident timeline

The day Dan Markel was shot

July 18, 2014, reconstructed from surveillance, phone records, receipts, and testimony across four trials.

22 events8:50 a.m. through early afternoon
Full case timelineFollow the case from the murder through the appealsView case timeline

Overview

What this timeline shows

Records establish Markel's preschool drop-off, his visit to Premier Health and Fitness, and the movement of his vehicle and a Prius toward Trescott Drive. Testimony describes the shooting and emergency response. Phone records, a liquor-store receipt, and witness accounts then trace the first calls and Wendi Adelson's route to Mosaic restaurant, where police contacted her.

DocumentedTied to a timestamped record or stipulation.
EstimatedApproximate time or order reconstructed from testimony or records.
DisputedRecords or testimony differ about the time, order, or account.

8:50–10:38 a.m.

Morning surveillance

The preschool stipulation and Premier surveillance establish Markel's morning movements.
  1. 8:50 a.m.Documented

    Markel drops the children at preschool

    The parties stipulated that Dan Markel dropped the children at Creative Preschool at 8:50 a.m. A witness later gave a different time estimate.

    View citations2
    GMWitness testimony
    Keith Leland's later estimateConflicts

    Leland recalled Markel and a Prius at the preschool, but estimated 9:45–10:00 rather than the stipulated 8:50 time.

  2. 9:16 a.m.Documented

    The Prius arrives at Premier Health and Fitness

    Surveillance video authenticated at trial showed the Prius arriving at Premier Health and Fitness.

    View citations3
    GMSurveillance
    Premier video and recordsSupports

    Corbitt testified that Premier video showed the Prius arrive at 9:16 and leave immediately after Markel at 10:38.

    GMRecords analysis
    Cell-site context at PremierLimits

    The testimony placed the Garcia and Rivera phones on sites and sectors consistent with Premier, not at an exact phone location.

    GMSurveillance
    Surveillance authenticationLimits

    Dietz authenticated the Premier and bus surveillance clips and their displayed times; the trial presentations included isolated spans, circles, or pauses.

  3. 10:38 a.m.Documented

    Markel leaves Premier; the Prius follows

    Premier surveillance showed Markel depart at 10:38 and the Prius leave immediately after.

    View citations3
    GMSurveillance
    Premier video and recordsSupports

    Corbitt testified that Premier video showed the Prius arrive at 9:16 and leave immediately after Markel at 10:38.

    GMRecords analysis
    Cell-site context at PremierLimits

    The testimony placed the Garcia and Rivera phones on sites and sectors consistent with Premier, not at an exact phone location.

    GMSurveillance
    Surveillance authenticationLimits

    Dietz authenticated the Premier and bus surveillance clips and their displayed times; the trial presentations included isolated spans, circles, or pauses.

10:48–about 11 a.m.

Route and shooting

Bus video and witness testimony narrow the route and shooting window without assigning a recorded time to the shots.
  1. 10:48–10:51 a.m.Documented

    Bus cameras place both vehicles on the route to Trescott

    Bus footage showed Markel's vehicle southbound near 10:48 and the Prius in the Benton Road turn lane at 10:51.

    View citations2
    CASurveillance
    Bus-video timesSupports

    Sanford adopted the displayed bus-video times: Markel southbound near 10:48, the Prius turning toward Benton at 10:51, and the Prius northbound near Bus 707 at 10:55.

    DARecords analysis
    Shooting-window reconstructionLimits

    Isom used the 10:51 and 10:55 bus views to narrow the shooting window. He described two apparent front-seat occupants and distinctive vehicle features, but the footage did not identify anyone inside.

  2. 10:51–10:55 a.m.Estimated

    Markel is shot inside the garage

    The bus observations bracket an approximately four-minute window but do not timestamp the shots. Rivera testified that Garcia approached the driver's side and fired; that identification comes from Rivera's account.

    View citations2
    DARecords analysis
    Shooting-window reconstructionLimits

    Isom used the 10:51 and 10:55 bus views to narrow the shooting window. He described two apparent front-seat occupants and distinctive vehicle features, but the footage did not identify anyone inside.

    GMParticipant testimony
    Luis Rivera's accountSupports

    Rivera testified that he drove behind Markel and that Garcia approached the driver's side and shot Markel twice; that attribution is Rivera's account.

  3. During the shooting windowEstimated

    Schlazer hears the interrupted call

    Schlazer said Markel mentioned an unfamiliar person, asked him to hold, and then stopped speaking after a loud sound. Schlazer later texted Markel and called 911. At trial, the call was described only as happening around 11; no timestamped record fixes its exact start or duration.

    View citations1
    GMWitness testimony
    Stuart Schlazer's accountSupports

    Schlazer described the unfamiliar person, loud sound, breathing, text, and 911 sequence; counsel supplied only the phrase 'around 11.'

  4. 10:55 a.m.Documented

    Bus 707 records the Prius near Hermitage

    A northbound bus camera showed the Prius near Hermitage. The footage appeared to show two front-seat occupants and distinctive vehicle features, but it did not identify anyone inside.

    View citations3
    CASurveillance
    Bus-video timesSupports

    Sanford adopted the displayed bus-video times: Markel southbound near 10:48, the Prius turning toward Benton at 10:51, and the Prius northbound near Bus 707 at 10:55.

    DARecords analysis
    Shooting-window reconstructionLimits

    Isom used the 10:51 and 10:55 bus views to narrow the shooting window. He described two apparent front-seat occupants and distinctive vehicle features, but the footage did not identify anyone inside.

    GMSurveillance
    Surveillance authenticationLimits

    Dietz authenticated the Premier and bus surveillance clips and their displayed times; the trial presentations included isolated spans, circles, or pauses.

Immediately afterward

Discovery and response

Neighbors and first responders describe the discovery at Trescott and the first aid provided there.
  1. Immediately afterwardEstimated

    Geiger hears a bang and sees a car leave

    Geiger said he heard a bang, saw a light-colored vehicle he believed looked like a Prius leave quickly, and first found the garage open with Markel's car running. He could not identify occupants or a tag.

    View citations1
    GMWitness testimony
    James Geiger's accountSupports

    Geiger described the bang, believed-Prius sighting, two garage checks, discovery, and said he called 911; he could not identify occupants or a tag.

  2. Minutes laterEstimated

    Geiger returns and finds Markel

    On a second check, Geiger found the shattered driver's window and Markel bloodied and unresponsive, then ran home for his phone.

    View citations1
    GMWitness testimony
    James Geiger's accountSupports

    Geiger described the bang, believed-Prius sighting, two garage checks, discovery, and said he called 911; he could not identify occupants or a tag.

  3. About 11:01–11:02 a.m.Disputed

    Two witnesses say they called 911

    Schlazer and Geiger each testified that he called 911. Their testimony does not establish the order of the calls or tie either the 11:01 or 11:02 time to a named caller.

    View citations3
    GMWitness testimony
    Stuart Schlazer's accountSupports

    Schlazer described the unfamiliar person, loud sound, breathing, text, and 911 sequence; counsel supplied only the phrase 'around 11.'

    GMWitness testimony
    James Geiger's accountSupports

    Geiger described the bang, believed-Prius sighting, two garage checks, discovery, and said he called 911; he could not identify occupants or a tag.

    DARecord evidence
    11:02 testimonyLimits

    Isom adopted 11:02 as the 911-call time, but the excerpt does not identify the caller; 11:01 appears elsewhere in attorney statements.

  4. During the 11 a.m. hourEstimated

    The first officer reaches Markel

    Sims said he arrived first and found Markel unresponsive and gasping, holding a phone in a locked, running vehicle. A 14:36 marker in the played 911 call is elapsed recording time, not the time of day.

    View citations2
    GMRecord evidence
    911 recording markerLimits

    Geiger confirmed that a first responder appeared 14:36 into the played recording; that marker is not a wall-clock time.

    GMWitness testimony
    David Sims's response accountSupports

    Sims described Markel unresponsive and gasping in the locked, running car and estimated EMS arrived three to four minutes after he did.

  5. 3–4 minutes after SimsEstimated

    EMS removes Markel from the car

    Sims estimated EMS arrived three to four minutes after he did. EMTs removed Markel from the car and provided aid.

    View citations1
    GMWitness testimony
    David Sims's response accountSupports

    Sims described Markel unresponsive and gasping in the locked, running car and estimated EMS arrived three to four minutes after he did.

11:42 a.m.–12:30 p.m.

Immediate calls

Phone records establish two post-shooting calls but not why they were made.
  1. 11:42 a.m.Documented

    Wendi calls Markel; the call goes to voicemail

    Phone-record testimony showed an unanswered outgoing call from Wendi Adelson to Markel that routed to voicemail. The record does not establish its purpose.

    View citations2
    KMRecord evidence
    Magbanua retrial phone recordsLimits

    Corbitt identified the unanswered 11:42 outgoing call; the records do not establish Wendi Adelson's purpose.

    GMRecord evidence
    11:42 call recordSupports

    Phone-record testimony showed an unanswered 11:42 outgoing call from Wendi Adelson to Markel that routed to voicemail.

  2. 12:29–12:30 p.m.Documented

    Garcia's phone reconnects and calls Magbanua

    The phone reconnected to the network around 12:29 and placed a short call to Magbanua at 12:30. The records do not show why it had been unavailable.

    View citations2
    GMRecord evidence
    12:30 connected callSupports

    Garcia's phone placed a connected outgoing call to Magbanua at 12:30; earlier forwarded events did not provide location.

About noon–after 1:30 p.m.

Wendi route and contact

Testimony, cell-site evidence, and a receipt reconstruct the route to Mosaic, first police contact, and the disclosure that followed.
  1. About noon–12:45 p.m.Disputed

    Wendi leaves for a last-minute lunch

    Wendi said she made a last-minute lunch plan and left home, but her estimates shift from around noon to roughly 12:30–12:45. A 12:31 call near her home is the first timestamped record of the route.

    View citations3
    KMWitness testimony
    2022 Wendi Adelson accountLimits

    Wendi Adelson described the last-minute lunch plan, guessed she left around noon, and said she turned at Trescott before continuing via Benton.

    CARecords analysis
    12:31–12:47 phone reconstructionSupports

    Phone events at 12:31, 12:35, and 12:47 plus the receipt support an approximate roadblock passage, not an exact logged time.

    KMCAWitness testimony
    Departure estimatesConflicts

    Wendi Adelson guessed around noon in 2022, then said refreshed memory put departure around 12:45 and adopted counsel's roughly 12:30 suggestion in 2023.

  2. 12:31–12:47 p.m.Estimated

    Phone records trace movement toward ABC Fine Wine and Spirits

    A call began on a site consistent with the residence area at 12:31, used another site at 12:35, and ended near the store at 12:47. The sites do not establish the phone's exact position.

    View citations3
    CARecords analysis
    12:31–12:47 phone reconstructionSupports

    Phone events at 12:31, 12:35, and 12:47 plus the receipt support an approximate roadblock passage, not an exact logged time.

    CARecords analysis
    Route comparisonLimits

    The GIS comparison was about 3.63 miles and 11 minutes versus almost 9.5 miles and a little over 20 minutes; it is route context, not motive evidence.

  3. About 12:35–12:45 p.m.Estimated

    Records place the roadblock encounter in a range

    Corbitt derived the range from call events, travel sequence, and the later receipt. It is a reconstruction, not a logged roadblock time.

    View citations2
    CARecords analysis
    12:31–12:47 phone reconstructionSupports

    Phone events at 12:31, 12:35, and 12:47 plus the receipt support an approximate roadblock passage, not an exact logged time.

    GMRecords analysis
    Roadblock and receipt reconstructionSupports

    Corbitt used the call sequence and 12:49 receipt to estimate a 12:35–12:45 roadblock encounter and found no later call to daycare, Markel, or 911.

  4. Within the roadblock windowDisputed

    The turn account changes across the four trials

    In 2019, Wendi Adelson said she did not turn onto Trescott; in 2022, she said she did. In a later trial, she agreed that any turnaround would have been a K-turn; in another, she described a three-point turn. Brannon saw an Odyssey turn near the roadblock but could not identify the driver.

    View citations5
    KMWitness testimony
    2022 Wendi Adelson accountLimits

    Wendi Adelson described the last-minute lunch plan, guessed she left around noon, and said she turned at Trescott before continuing via Benton.

    GMRecords analysis
    Roadblock and receipt reconstructionSupports

    Corbitt used the call sequence and 12:49 receipt to estimate a 12:35–12:45 roadblock encounter and found no later call to daycare, Markel, or 911.

    CARecord evidence
    Calls absent after 12:47Supports

    Corbitt's highlighted records after 12:47 contained no call to Markel, Creative Preschool, 911, or police.

  5. 12:49:13 p.m.Documented

    The ABC receipt timestamps the transaction

    The receipt timestamped Wendi's bourbon transaction at 12:49:13. It does not itself timestamp the earlier roadblock encounter.

    View citations2
    GMRecords analysis
    Roadblock and receipt reconstructionSupports

    Corbitt used the call sequence and 12:49 receipt to estimate a 12:35–12:45 roadblock encounter and found no later call to daycare, Markel, or 911.

    CARecord evidence
    12:49:13 receiptSupports

    The receipt fixed the ABC transaction at 12:49:13; it did not timestamp the earlier roadblock encounter.

  6. After 12:49 p.m.Estimated

    Wendi arrives at Mosaic restaurant

    Wendi said she went from the liquor store to Mosaic, where Isom found her eating with two other people.

    View citations3
    DAWitness testimony
    2025 Craig Isom estimateSupports

    Isom estimated 2:15, saw Wendi Adelson with two other people at Mosaic, moved her aside to discuss her ex-husband, and reassured her that the children were safe.

    GMWitness testimony
    2019 Craig Isom estimateConflicts

    Isom named Mosaic but estimated contact at 1:30–2:00, producing a genuine range against his later estimate.

  7. About 1:30–2:15 p.m.Disputed

    Isom makes contact at the restaurant

    Isom's estimates span 1:30–2:15 across trials. He moved Wendi away from the table, said he needed to discuss something involving her ex-husband, and reassured her that the children were safe.

    View citations2
    DAWitness testimony
    2025 Craig Isom estimateSupports

    Isom estimated 2:15, saw Wendi Adelson with two other people at Mosaic, moved her aside to discuss her ex-husband, and reassured her that the children were safe.

    GMWitness testimony
    2019 Craig Isom estimateConflicts

    Isom named Mosaic but estimated contact at 1:30–2:00, producing a genuine range against his later estimate.

  8. After restaurant contactEstimated

    Wendi Adelson says police told her Markel was shot

    Wendi Adelson testified that officers did not tell her at the restaurant that Markel had been shot; she said they told her in the police car before the station interview.

    View citations1
    DAWitness testimony
    Wendi Adelson's account of what police told herSupports

    Wendi Adelson said police did not tell her at the restaurant that it was a shooting; she said they told her in the car before the interview room.