Skip to content
Donna Adelsontrial-daytrial-dayGeorgia CapplemanSarah Kathryn DuganJackie L. FulfordJoshua D. ZelmanLouis BronsteinChristopher CorbittOscar Jimenez Jr.Brian KendallPatrick SanfordJames Keith McElveendirectcrossredirectcross_waivedDay 4 - August 27, 2025Records testimony addressed 2014 travel and communications, followed by testimony on the 2016 undercover contact, wiretap recordings, and surveillance.
← Day 3Donna AdelsonDay 5 →

Day 4 - August 27, 2025

Records Testimony, Undercover Contact, And Wiretap Evidence

Judge Stephen S. Everett
21Proceedings
6Pages
6Witnesses
2,716Lines
6Sidebars
Day 4 of 9
Appearing:

Records testimony addressed 2014 travel and communications, followed by testimony on the 2016 undercover contact, wiretap recordings, and surveillance.

Full day summary

Christopher Corbitt continued his records-based account of the June and July 2014 travel and communications, then described the 2016 wiretap. On cross-examination, he agreed that cell-site mapping cannot identify a handset's precise location and that the records could not place Donna Adelson's handset at Charlie Adelson's residence on July 18. The court also ruled that the State could pursue proposed testimony as an adoptive admission if it established the required foundation. Former FBI agent Oscar Jimenez Jr. described an undercover 2016 contact with Donna Adelson, and the court admitted the flyer and recordings associated with that operation. FBI witnesses then authenticated restaurant-surveillance and wiretap-related recordings and photographs. Agent Patrick Sanford testified about the undercover contact, recordings of calls that followed it, and surveillance photographs of a later in-person meeting between Donna Adelson and Charlie Adelson; he said that meeting was not audibly recorded.

Video thumbnail8:41:04
Watch →

1. Christopher Corbitt — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Christopher Corbitt continued explaining travel, phone, GPS, and wiretap records. Judge Everett allowed the State to pursue an adoptive-admission theory over defense objections, and Corbitt later addressed record limitations and travel-time analysis on cross and redirect.

→
Procedural
Day 4 Court Convenes — Jury Greeted, Corbitt Examination Resumes
28 lines
Direct
Christopher Corbitt - Direct (Continued) Christopher Corbitt Sarah Kathryn Dugan
854 lines

Cell-site analyst Christopher Corbitt traced phone, GPS, rental, and message records through the June and July 2014 trips and the aftermath of Dan Markel's killing.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Expert Testimony ReviewThe parties addressed expert access to other testimony and the continued sequestration of lay witnesses.
sidebar
Prior Testimony and Adoptive Admission Christopher Corbitt Sarah Kathryn Dugan
18 lines

The parties disputed whether a witness could address Charlie Adelson’s prior testimony and whether Donna Adelson’s later messages could be treated as an adoptive admission.

Procedural
Adoptive Admission Ruling — Defense Crawford and Foundation Objections Overruled
27 lines

The court allowed the State to pursue proposed testimony as an adoptive admission, preserved the defense Crawford objection, and required a supporting foundation.

Cross
Christopher Corbitt - Cross Christopher Corbitt Joshua D. Zelman
329 lines

Corbitt agreed that cell-site records cannot precisely locate a handset and could not place Donna Adelson's handset at Charlie Adelson's residence; he also explained limits in call-count and travel-timing analysis.

Redirect
Christopher Corbitt - Redirect Christopher Corbitt Sarah Kathryn Dugan
37 lines

Corbitt clarified his text-message, drive-timing, and cell-site opinions, saying his drive test matched estimated travel times and the records did not undermine his analysis.

Procedural
Recess Before Protected Witness; Camera Restriction Ordered
11 lines
sidebar
Open-Line Audio Review
10 lines

Counsel discussed giving the defense time to review original and enhanced versions of an open-line call recording and choose which version to publish.

Procedural
Recess Before Protected Witness; Camera Restriction Ordered (Resumed)
2 lines

Highlights

2. Oscar Jimenez Jr. — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Former FBI agent Oscar Jimenez Jr. testified about a 2016 undercover contact with Donna Adelson, with related recordings admitted into evidence.

→
Direct
Oscar Jimenez Jr. - Direct Oscar Jimenez Jr. Georgia Cappleman
125 lines

Former FBI agent Oscar Jimenez Jr. described an undercover contact with Donna Adelson and authenticated the flyer, recordings, and related calls admitted as State's Exhibits 83, 112, and 117.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Gang Portrayal Testimony LimitsThe sidebar addressed the permissible scope of testimony about the witness's gang-member portrayal during an operation.
Cross
Oscar Jimenez Jr. - Cross Oscar Jimenez Jr. Jackie L. Fulford
144 lines

Jimenez said the flyer, follow-up text, and calls were part of the undercover effort, but no $5,000 payment was made.

Redirect
Oscar Jimenez Jr. - Redirect Oscar Jimenez Jr. Georgia Cappleman
13 lines

Jimenez said Donna Adelson was alone during the undercover approach, and the defense retained the option to recall him.

Highlights

3. Louis Bronstein — Direct/Cross

FBI Special Agent Louis Bronstein described recording an April 2016 restaurant meeting, after which the defense declined cross-examination and the court excused him.

→
Direct
Louis Bronstein - Direct Louis Bronstein Georgia Cappleman
78 lines

FBI agent Louis Bronstein authenticated surveillance evidence from an April 2016 restaurant meeting; the court admitted related photographs and State's Exhibit 114 without objection.

Cross Waived
Louis Bronstein - Cross (Waived) Louis Bronstein Jackie L. Fulford
5 lines

The defense waived cross-examination of Louis Bronstein, and both parties declined to recall him.

4. James Keith McElveen — Direct/Cross

Audio-forensics expert James Keith McElveen explained his work reducing background sound in recordings, followed by defense questions about restaurant footage and other audio he had not reviewed.

→
Direct
James Keith McElveen - Direct James Keith McElveen Georgia Cappleman
89 lines

Audio-forensics expert James Keith McElveen explained his enhancement method, and the court admitted enhanced recording exhibits from the Dolce vita and Matsuri restaurants.

Cross
James Keith McElveen - Cross James Keith McElveen Joshua D. Zelman
22 lines

McElveen said recent restaurant-footage work did not add an enhancement and that he had not reviewed audio from Wendi Adelson's July 18, 2014 interview.

5. Brian Kendall — Direct/Cross

Brian Kendall authenticated a 2016 covert recording of Charles and Harvey Adelson at a Miami restaurant, which the court admitted without objection.

→
Direct
Brian Kendall - Direct Brian Kendall Georgia Cappleman
50 lines

Brian Kendall described covertly recording Charles and Harvey Adelson at a Miami restaurant, and the court admitted State's Exhibit 131 without objection.

Cross Waived
Brian Kendall - Cross (Waived) Brian Kendall Jackie L. Fulford
6 lines

The defense waived cross-examination of Brian Kendall, who was released without recall.

sidebar
Pat Sanford Testimony Schedule Brian Kendall Jackie L. Fulford
9 lines

The court and counsel discussed starting Pat Sanford's testimony, which was not expected to finish that day.

6. Patrick Sanford — Direct (Part 1)

FBI Special Agent Patrick Sanford began direct testimony on corroborating evidence, wiretap recordings, and surveillance tied to Donna and Charlie Adelson. Before recess, the defense preserved an objection concerning questions during recorded-call playback; Sanford's examination was set to continue at 8:30.

→
Direct
Patrick Sanford - Direct (Part 1) Patrick Sanford Georgia Cappleman
848 lines

FBI agent Patrick Sanford described Prius corroboration, authenticated wiretap and undercover-contact evidence, and recounted the calls and surveillance that followed the contact.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Limits on Repetitive Phone Call QuestionsThe defense objected that questioning after phone-call excerpts were published was repetitive, while the prosecution said it would highlight important portions and seek additional context.
Procedural
Day 4 Recess — Fulford Preserves Record on Cumulative Testimony
11 lines

Fulford preserved a cumulative-testimony objection during recorded-call playback; the court reaffirmed its prior ruling and recessed until 8:30.

Highlights

← Day 3Donna AdelsonDay 5 →