Day 4 - October 31, 2023
Testimony addressed phone-record limits, undercover contacts, restaurant recordings, and the court's instructions on audio transcripts.
Full day summary
8:19:011. Christopher Corbitt — Cross/Redirect/Recross
The court set conditions for the Dolce Vita transcript demonstrative, then Christopher Corbitt completed testimony about the limits and interpretation of phone and cell-site records.
Cross975 lines
Christopher Corbitt - Cross Christopher Corbitt Dan Rashbaum
5 sidebars inside this proceeding
- Text Message Context ObjectionCounsel disputed whether unadmitted text messages could be used to challenge the context of a witness's summary testimony.
- Juror Inquiry on Courtroom CommentsCounsel discussed whether a juror may have heard courtroom comments and how to conduct a follow-up inquiry.
- Gallery Reactions and Jury InstructionThe sidebar addressed a deputy's note about possible gallery-related disruption and a proposed instruction that jurors disregard reactions in the gallery.
- Victim's Mother Allowed to ReturnCounsel addressed a gallery issue involving the victim's elderly mother and requested that she be permitted to return.
- Call Graph Demonstrative UseThe parties disputed whether call-communication graphs accurately reflected the underlying records and could be shown during witness examination.
Highlights
Dolce Vita Transcript Demonstrative — Defense Objection and Ruling on Inaudible MarkersrulingThe court required the demonstrative to match the transcript, including the word “inaudible,” and said the State would need to lay any further foundation before it was shown to the jury.Christopher Corbitt - Cross“We don't have any recordings of those. So we don't know what was said during those communications.”— Christopher CorbittCorbitt confirmed that the call records did not reveal the substance of the conversations.Christopher Corbitt - CrossrulingThe court allowed defense counsel to ask about text messages for context but barred verbatim reading of unadmitted messages unless used for impeachment.
4. James Keith McElveen — Direct/Cross
Forensic engineer James Keith McElveen described audio enhancements and their limits, followed by the court's finalization of a cautionary instruction before the modified Dolce Vita recording was played.
Highlights
James Keith McElveen - Directevidence eventThe court admitted State's Exhibit 110, McElveen's audio work product for the Dolce Vita recording, over the defense's prior objection.James Keith McElveen - Direct“No, when we begin our processing, we set up the controls, and the tool does not allow you to actually make any changes. You hit process, and it starts at the beginning and works all the way to the end. And you can't change anything as you go along and decide to leave the word "no" or “yes” out. You get the entire thing, and the same length of the recording in is the same that comes out down to microseconds.”— James Keith McElveenMcElveen testified that the processing tool could not be adjusted to add, remove, or selectively alter words.
6. Patrick Sanford — Direct
FBI Special Agent Patrick Sanford was recalled to authenticate recovered-Prius photographs and wiretap and undercover recordings, including recordings connected to the 2016 undercover contact with Donna Adelson.
Highlights
Patrick Sanford - Direct (Recall)“Hey. Sorry about that. Quick question for you -- oh, one thing I was going to tell you is, obviously, don't talk about things in the apartment or anyplace.”— Charlie AdelsonIn the recorded call, Charlie Adelson told Donna Adelson not to discuss matters in the apartment or elsewhere.Patrick Sanford - Direct (Recall)evidence eventThe court admitted the Dolce recording and instructed jurors that the recording, not the accompanying transcript, was the evidence.