Skip to content
Magbanua Retrial trial-day trial-day Georgia CapplemanSarah Kathryn DuganChristopher DeCosteTara KawassChristopher CorbittWaldo Mesa NunezLuis RiveracrossredirectdirectDay 3 - May 20, 2022 Day 3 closed out Luis Rivera's three days on the stand, with cross-examination surfacing a gun-count contradiction, an unsworn throwaway-phone claim, and a disputed third-trip reference, while redirect rehabilitated his independent corrections and elicited his account of Magbanua directing the post-murder money pickup. Judge Wheeler ruled co-conspirator statements admissible through the payment date in a murder-for-hire. Rental records placed Sigfredo Garcia in Miami in June 2014, and Sergeant Corbitt's cell-site analysis traced Garcia's phone to Markel's gym the morning of the murder, documented a two-hour phone blackout covering the killing, and showed Magbanua as Garcia's most-called contact and Charlie Adelson's second most frequent — with her own iCloud saving Rivera's number under the nickname "Tato." A discovery dispute over untimely jail call disclosures produced a Richardson hearing set for Monday.
← Day 2 Magbanua Retrial Day 4 →

Day 3 - May 20, 2022

Luis Rivera Testimony Concludes; Cell Analysis Ties Magbanua to Garcia, Adelson, and Murder Timeline

Judge Robert R. Wheeler
9 Proceedings
3 Pages
3 Witnesses
2,325 Lines
Day 3 of 8
Appearing:

Day 3 closed out Luis Rivera's three days on the stand, with cross-examination surfacing a gun-count contradiction, an unsworn throwaway-phone claim, and a disputed third-trip reference, while redirect rehabilitated his independent corrections and elicited his account of Magbanua directing the post-murder money pickup. Judge Wheeler ruled co-conspirator statements admissible through the payment date in a murder-for-hire. Rental records placed Sigfredo Garcia in Miami in June 2014, and Sergeant Corbitt's cell-site analysis traced Garcia's phone to Markel's gym the morning of the murder, documented a two-hour phone blackout covering the killing, and showed Magbanua as Garcia's most-called contact and Charlie Adelson's second most frequent — with her own iCloud saving Rivera's number under the nickname "Tato." A discovery dispute over untimely jail call disclosures produced a Richardson hearing set for Monday.

Full day summary

Day 3 opened with a defense objection before the jury was seated: Tara Kawass placed on the record that the State had handed over amended discovery that morning — recordings of jail calls — after the jury had been selected and opening statements delivered, leaving defense counsel no time to review. Prosecutor Cappleman acknowledged she had not yet reviewed the calls herself and offered to advise the court Monday on whether she intended to use any. Judge Wheeler ordered that the calls not be used that day, directed both sides to review over the weekend, and scheduled a Richardson hearing for Monday to determine whether a discovery violation had occurred and whether the recordings would be admitted. Before Rivera's cross resumed, Judge Wheeler ruled on two procedural questions: immediate clip playback for impeachment is permissible only when the witness has already given a directly contradictory answer; equivocal or non-responsive answers require the standard pre-showing procedure first. The parties also resolved a transcript accommodation for Rivera's illiteracy, allowing defense counsel to read quietly to him at the stand if needed, with headphone audio as a fallback. Also before the jury was called in, Wheeler issued a hearsay ruling: in a murder-for-hire, the conspiracy does not end at the victim's death but continues until payment is made, citing Romani v. State and Eccles v. State. Rivera's account of Magbanua confirming the job was done over an open phone line — and her delivery of money to Rivera the next day — satisfied the foundation requirement, making the hitmen's return-drive statements admissible. Cappleman supplemented the record, cataloguing six categories of pre-murder co-conspirator statements already in through Rivera, and separately argued that Magbanua's post-murder "I know" statement was independently admissible as an admission by a party opponent. Wheeler deferred a Crawford challenge to recorded Adelson family calls to a later hearing before Agent Sanford testifies. Continuing cross-examination, Christopher DeCoste pursued four lines of impeachment. First, he established that Rivera had testified on direct that two guns were brought on the murder trip but revised that to one after hearing his 2016 recorded statement; Rivera's excuse — "eight years, who's gonna remember?" — was immediately undercut because DeCoste had just established that remembering testimony was Rivera's sole obligation since his arrest. Second, DeCoste attacked Rivera's vagueness about the gun's disposal, suggesting he was protecting himself from a federal interstate-commerce charge; Rivera, reviewing his deposition, conceded awareness of that exposure. Third, a deposition passage in which Rivera used the phrase "the first trip in June, the second trip, the third trip" prompted him to claim a separate King Anthony reconnaissance he had never mentioned in any prior sworn statement. Fourth, DeCoste built a jealousy-based alternative motive: Garcia used cocaine and alcohol daily, stalked Charlie Adelson, and nearly drove a truck through a restaurant where Adelson was dining with Magbanua. Rivera resisted throughout, insisting Magbanua was "involved the whole time" and that Garcia "does whatever she tells him to do." Rivera also broke composure during cross, snapping at DeCoste to stop repeating himself. On redirect, Cappleman countered the theory that Rivera simply adopted the state's narrative by eliciting that he independently corrected the state on two facts absent from any police report: the payment was delivered the morning after the murder rather than that night, and the crew had shot a hole in the Prius. Rivera explained the cell-phone records challenge raised on cross by disclosing he had carried two phones that morning and had given one to Anthony, and further testified that Magbanua called him that morning and said "Who's going to come get this money?" — placing her as the party holding payment. Rivera contextualized the third-trip deposition language as speculation about who a neighbor might have seen behind Markel's house, denied participating in any third trip, and described Garcia's restaurant episode as ending without any face-to-face confrontation because Rivera talked him down. The redirect closed with Rivera acknowledging that testifying against his best friend and "his wife" is "hard" and "hurts." Wheeler twice warned Cappleman about leading questions, and multiple defense objections on leading, improper bolstering, and improper refreshment were sustained throughout. Waldo Mesa Nunez, who worked the evening shift at Comfort Rent-A-Car in 2014 and now serves as a Florida Highway Patrol trooper, authenticated two rental agreements in his own handwriting showing a man identified as "Fredo Garcia" rented a silver Nissan Altima on June 2, 2014, then exchanged it the next day for a blue Hyundai Sonata — both paid cash at $49 per day with a $500 deposit. GPS tracking records for both vehicles were admitted alongside the contracts as State's Exhibits 70 and 71. On cross, Kawass established that Nunez has no independent recollection of Garcia — he cannot describe Garcia's appearance or how he arrived — and that the "time in" field on the exchange contract carries the due-back time from the first rental rather than recording Garcia's actual arrival. Short redirect clarified that the 8:50 p.m. timestamp on the first contract was written at the moment Nunez began it, making it Garcia's actual arrival time. Sergeant Christopher Corbitt, a 27-year TPD veteran who has testified in approximately 80 expert cell-phone cases, then presented the prosecution's cell-site and tower dump evidence. He first traced Wendi Adelson's July 18 route past the Trescott Drive crime scene around 12:40–12:45 p.m., noting her call records showed no contact to Markel, the children's daycare, or 911 after encountering the police roadblock, and that she drove a route nearly nine and a half miles long when a roughly three-and-a-half-mile alternative was available. Tower dump analysis of Markel's stops that morning identified Garcia's Miami phone at the Premier Health and Fitness cell site at 9:36 and 9:58 a.m. Cross-referencing the dump against known subjects revealed that a Miami number present at Premier Gym on the murder morning had called Harvey Adelson's phone seventeen days earlier — on July 1, 2014 — going to voicemail for approximately 37 seconds; that number was identified as Garcia's. A frequency report on Garcia's records showed his most frequently contacted number was Katherine Magbanua's. A parallel frequency report on Charlie Adelson's records showed Magbanua was his second most frequent contact for the same period. State's Exhibit 73 (Corbitt's cell-site summary) and Exhibits 101–104 (tower dump carrier records) were admitted. A hearsay objection was sustained when the prosecution attempted to have Corbitt relay Yindra Mascaro's explanation for the Garcia-Harvey Adelson voicemail. Resuming after lunch, Corbitt traced the prosecution's timeline chronologically. For the June 2014 reconnaissance, Magbanua's phone registered consistent with the Comfort Rent-A-Car at 8:53 p.m. — three minutes after Garcia's contract was written — with no Garcia-Magbanua phone contact during the drive, consistent with them traveling together; she then received a call from Charlie Adelson followed by a 25-minute conversation. GPS data from the rental car and Rivera's cell records placed the vehicle in the Betton Hills/Winthrop Park area adjacent to Markel's residence on June 5. For the July murder trip, Garcia and Rivera drove to Tallahassee on July 16, their phones consistent with Markel's neighborhood on July 17. On July 18, Garcia's phone registered at Premier Gym through 9:58 a.m. then went dark for over two hours covering the murder window; at 12:30 p.m., carrier notification patterns indicated the phone had just been powered back on in Alachua County, and Garcia's first outgoing call was to Katherine Magbanua. That evening, all three phones — Garcia, Rivera, and Magbanua — registered consistent with Rivera's 135th Street residence by approximately 9:46 p.m., at which point Magbanua's frequent Garcia communications ceased abruptly. On the morning of July 19, Magbanua attempted Garcia's number six times, contacted an Ortiz number, and Rivera tried Garcia before calling Magbanua; Garcia's phone showed no further active events from 7:09 a.m. onward, consistent with the phone being discarded. By 10:31 a.m., both Magbanua's and Rivera's phones were consistent with Rivera's residence, followed by a final brief call between them. Corbitt confirmed that no Adelson family handset — Charlie, Wendi, Donna, or Harvey — ever directly communicated with Garcia's or Rivera's phones, except for the single unanswered July 1 voicemail Garcia left on Harvey Adelson's line. Outside the jury, Dugan proffered Corbitt's additional testimony that Magbanua's iCloud contact list saved Rivera's number under the nickname "Tato" — his street name — with Garcia saved as "Tuto." DeCoste challenged the proffer: he argued "Tato" is too common a nickname to conclusively identify Rivera, and he produced a defense copy of an Apple return document showing a 935-prefix number rather than the 934 number at issue, contending the prosecution relied on a separate Apple subpoena return never disclosed to the defense. Dugan acknowledged the prosecution itself had only surfaced the document at lunch that day. Wheeler ruled that because Corbitt derived the information from Magbanua's own iCloud data — already disclosed on a Cellebrite CD in defense hands — no Richardson hearing was required and the testimony was admissible. A residual question about whether the Apple subpoena return for the 934 number was separately produced was deferred pending state verification. Corbitt's cross-examination was adjourned to Monday. In a brief pre-weekend direct segment, Corbitt testified that Magbanua placed one unanswered call to the "Tato" number during the June 2014 reconnaissance trip — the first time in any records she called it — and attempted it twice on the evening of July 17, sandwiched between Garcia communications, though neither call connected. After the jury was excused, Wheeler reconciled a clerical numbering error in the Garcia-Rivera photograph exhibits — confirming the hole-in-the-Prius image is Exhibit 48, not 47 — and previewed Monday's schedule: completing Corbitt's cross first, then Jessica Rodriguez (flagged by Cappleman as the most substantial morning witness), followed by out-of-town financial evidence witnesses, with the court prepared to extend to 5:30 p.m. if needed. The Richardson hearing on the jail calls was confirmed for Monday morning.

Video thumbnail 7:35:40
Watch →

1. Luis Rivera — Cross (Continued)/Redirect

Day 3 opens with two defense objections before the jury enters: a Richardson hearing ordered over late-disclosed jail call recordings, and ground rules set for Rivera's impeachment video clips and transcript accommodation given his illiteracy. Judge Wheeler also issues a pre-jury ruling that the murder-for-hire conspiracy extends past the victim's death to the payment, admitting co-conspirator statements from the return drive to Miami. Rivera's cross-examination then resumes, with DeCoste pressing four impeachment lines — a gun-count contradiction, vague weapon-disposal answers, a previously unmentioned "third trip," and a jealousy-based alternative motive centering on Garcia's obsession with Magbanua. Cappleman's redirect follows, rehabilitating Rivera by pointing to details he independently corrected that were absent from police reports, clarifying the two-phone cell record discrepancy, and contextualizing both the "third trip" deposition language and the Garcia restaurant episode.

Procedural
Untimely Jail Call Discovery — Richardson Hearing Ordered for Monday
Procedural
Rivera Cross-Examination: Impeachment Clip and Transcript Protocol
Procedural
Admissibility ruling — co-conspirator statements and murder-for-hire conspiracy timeline
Cross
Luis Rivera Christopher DeCoste
475 lines

Defense attorney DeCoste completes his cross-examination of cooperating hitman Luis Rivera, drawing out contradictions on gun counts, a previously unmentioned throwaway-phone explanation, and a deposition slip referencing a third Tallahassee trip, while building the theory that Garcia acted alone out of obsessive jealousy over Katherine Magbanua.

Redirect
Luis Rivera Georgia Cappleman
229 lines

Prosecutor Cappleman uses redirect to counter three main cross-examination attacks: Rivera corrected the state on facts absent from police reports (undercutting the regurgitation theory), a second phone he gave to Anthony explains the Normandy Isle cell-tower gap, and his 'third trip' deposition language referred to Garcia's separate reconnaissance with King Anthony — not Rivera. Rivera also testifies emotionally that testifying against his best friend 'hurts,' and describes Garcia's violent rage at watching Magbanua dine with Charlie Adelson, stopped only by Rivera's intervention.

Highlights

Untimely Jail Call Discovery — Richardson Hearing Ordered for Monday procedural action Defense places on the record that the State delivered amended discovery — jail call recordings — on the morning of Day 3, after jury selection and opening statements, with no prior opportunity for review. Untimely Jail Call Discovery — Richardson Hearing Ordered for Monday ruling Judge Wheeler orders the jail calls not be used that day, directs both parties to review over the weekend, and schedules a Richardson hearing for Monday to resolve whether a discovery violation occurred and whether the recordings will be admitted. Untimely Jail Call Discovery — Richardson Hearing Ordered for Monday “they're not going to be used today, correct? So use the weekend to go over them, and then I'll make a decision when I know more about them, and we'll have a hearing on them on Monday in order to determine, number one, whether they're going to be used at all, and number two, if the State's intending to do that, whether they will be used. Based on the Court's ruling, we'll have a Richardson hearing at that time.” — Robert R. Wheeler Judge Wheeler's ruling defers any admissibility determination and formally schedules a Richardson hearing, making the jail calls a live evidentiary question that will carry into the next court session. Admissibility ruling — co-conspirator statements and murder-for-hire conspiracy timeline ruling Judge Wheeler rules co-conspirator statements made after the murder but before payment are admissible, holding that in a murder-for-hire the conspiracy continues until money is delivered. He cites Romani v. State and Eccles v. State and declines further argument. Admissibility ruling — co-conspirator statements and murder-for-hire conspiracy timeline “the conspiracy has more than one objective: it has both the objective of the murder of the victim and the objective of getting payment for that murder. So the conspiracy does not stop at the time of the murder, which it does in many cases, but if it's a murder-for-hire and there's money exchanging hands for that murder, the conspiracy does not end until the money is paid.” — Robert R. Wheeler The legal foundation for the ruling: Wheeler identifies payment as a distinct conspiracy objective, extending the hearsay exception window past the victim's death and making post-murder statements admissible. Admissibility ruling — co-conspirator statements and murder-for-hire conspiracy timeline “she said, "I know," and she was informed that the job was done. That statement, the State would argue, was admissible separately, not as a co-conspirator statement, but as an admission of a party opponent.” — Georgia Cappleman Cappleman articulates an independent admissibility path for Magbanua's post-murder acknowledgment, framing it as an admission by a party opponent and insulating it from any challenge to the conspiracy-duration analysis. Luis Rivera - Cross (Part 2) testimony highlight Gun count reversal: Rivera testified on direct that two guns were brought on the murder trip; after hearing his October 2016 recording he revised that to one. His excuse — eight years, who's gonna remember — was immediately turned against the premise that testimony was his only obligation since 2016. Luis Rivera - Cross (Part 2) “Yes, sir. I mean, we all make mistakes. As many years, memories, you forget stuff. Eight years, who's gonna remember?” — Luis Rivera Rivera's excuse for changing his gun count from two to one after hearing his own recording — strategically damaging because DeCoste had just established that remembering this testimony was Rivera's sole job since his 2016 arrest, making the I-forget-things defense self-contradictory. Luis Rivera - Cross (Part 2) confrontation Throwaway phone invention: DeCoste confronted Rivera with Magbanua's cell records showing no pre-noon Garcia call on Thursday. Rivera introduced a new claim — throwaway phones — that had never appeared in any prior sworn statement. DeCoste catalogued all six prior appearances to underscore the omission. Luis Rivera - Cross (Part 2) “Would I be surprised? I'll tell you, they had throwaway phones.” — Luis Rivera Rivera's improvised explanation for why Magbanua's phone records show no pre-noon call to Garcia on the day of his alleged sighting. DeCoste immediately pointed out this claim had never appeared in any of his six prior sworn statements over six years. Luis Rivera - Cross (Part 2) testimony highlight Garcia jealousy theory confrontation: DeCoste walked Rivera through Garcia's violent jealousy — daily cocaine and alcohol use, stalking Charlie Adelson, nearly running over a dinner party Magbanua attended with Adelson — before asking whether Garcia played Rivera. Rivera agreed, then reframed his answer to mean Garcia confronted Charlie, not that Garcia deceived him about Magbanua's role. Rivera closed by insisting Magbanua was Garcia's weakness who directed his every action. Luis Rivera - Cross (Part 2) “It's the only girl he speaks to is Katie. Whatever she tells him to do, he jumps and does it.” — Luis Rivera Rivera's closing rebuttal to the Garcia-jealousy theory — insisting Magbanua controlled Garcia absolutely. His final substantive answer before DeCoste rested turned the defense's own characterization of Garcia's obsession into evidence of Magbanua's command over him. Luis Rivera - Redirect testimony highlight Cappleman elicits that Rivera independently corrected the state on two facts absent from any police report — the payment was delivered the morning after the murder, not that night, and the crew shot a hole in the Prius — directly undercutting the defense's theory that Rivera simply adopted the state's narrative. Luis Rivera - Redirect testimony highlight Rivera discloses he had two phones the morning of the money drop and had given one to Anthony; Magbanua called him on the phone he retained, asking 'Who's going to come get this money?' — providing both an explanation for the Normandy Isle cell-tower signal raised on cross and direct testimony placing Magbanua as money-director. Luis Rivera - Redirect “She said, 'Who's going to come get this money?'” — Luis Rivera Rivera relays Magbanua's direct words to him the morning after the murder, placing her as the active holder of the payment and coordinator of its distribution — directly addressing the defense's cell-phone-records challenge by situating her call on a phone Rivera confirms he had in his possession. Luis Rivera - Redirect “That's hard.” — Luis Rivera Rivera's emotional acknowledgment that testifying against Garcia and Magbanua — his best friend and 'his wife' — is personally painful, offered as a counter to the defense's theory that he named them opportunistically because they were safe to implicate.

2. Waldo Mesa Nunez — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Waldo Mesa Nunez, a former Comfort Rent-A-Car employee, authenticates the June 2014 rental agreements showing Sigfredo Garcia rented a silver Nissan Altima and then exchanged it for a blue Hyundai Sonata near Miami International Airport, paying cash. Cross-examination focuses on Nunez's lack of independent memory of Garcia and a timestamp ambiguity in the exchange contract; redirect resolves that ambiguity.

Direct
Waldo Mesa Nunez Sarah Kathryn Dugan
167 lines

Former Comfort Rent-A-Car employee Waldo Mesa Nunez authenticates rental agreements (State's 70 and 71) showing Sigfredo Garcia rented two successive Miami vehicles in early June 2014, paid in cash, with GPS tracking data attached; prosecution also introduces State's Exhibit 65, a traffic citation bearing Luis Rivera's name.

Cross
Waldo Mesa Nunez Tara Kawass
122 lines

Defense cross-examines former Comfort Rent-a-Car employee Nunez to establish he has no independent memory of Sigfredo Garcia, that the busy Miami airport-area business served hundreds of anonymous customers monthly, and that questions about the traffic citation's checkboxes belong to the officer who wrote it.

Redirect
Waldo Mesa Nunez Sarah Kathryn Dugan
23 lines

Prosecutor Dugan uses a brief redirect to establish that the 8:50 p.m. timestamp on the first rental contract is reliable because Nunez recorded it when he began writing the agreement, and that carrying the same time to the exchange contract was standard practice.

Procedural
Mid-Morning Recess and Pre-Testimony Logistics

3. Christopher Corbitt — Direct

Cell-site and tower dump testimony from Sergeant Christopher Corbitt spans the full trial day, tracing Garcia and Rivera's phones through the June 2014 reconnaissance and July 2014 murder trip, and placing Magbanua's phone in contact with Garcia at each critical juncture.

Direct
Christopher Corbitt Sarah Kathryn Dugan
341 lines

TPD cell analyst Sergeant Corbitt places Sigfredo Garcia's phone near Premier Gym on the murder morning, identifies Katherine Magbanua as Garcia's most-called contact and Charlie Adelson's second most frequent contact — providing carrier-record corroboration of the prosecution's intermediary theory.

Procedural
Lunch Break
Direct
Christopher Corbitt Sarah Kathryn Dugan
655 lines

TPD cell analyst Corbitt completes his direct examination with a comprehensive chronological walkthrough of cell site, GPS, and communications evidence spanning the June 2014 reconnaissance trip, the July 18 murder, and the post-murder call flurry — establishing that Garcia's first post-murder call was to Magbanua and that no Adelson handset ever directly reached the hitmen.

Procedural
OJP — Proffer on 'Tato' iCloud Contact / Richardson Hearing Argument
140 lines

Prosecution proffers Sgt. Corbitt's testimony that Magbanua's iCloud shows Rivera's nickname 'Tato' saved under a 934-prefix number; defense demands a Richardson hearing over an Apple subpoena return it says was never disclosed; Wheeler rules the testimony admissible but defers the document disclosure question.

Direct
Christopher Corbitt Sarah Kathryn Dugan
48 lines

Corbitt confirms Magbanua had Luis Rivera's nickname 'Tato' saved in her iCloud contacts and called that number during both the June reconnaissance and July murder trips — though neither call connected.

Procedural
Jury dismissed for weekend; exhibit list reconciled and Monday witnesses previewed

Highlights

Christopher Corbitt - Direct testimony highlight Cross-referencing tower dump numbers against known subjects' call records reveals that a number at the Premier Gym cell site on murder day called Harvey Adelson's phone on July 1, 2014 — seventeen days before the murder — and was identified as Garcia's. AT&T records show the call was routed to voicemail with approximately 37 seconds of connection time. Christopher Corbitt - Direct “Yes, that number was associated with Mr. Garcia.” — Christopher Corbitt Corbitt identifies the Miami number that called Harvey Adelson's phone seventeen days before the murder as Sigfredo Garcia's, establishing a direct pre-murder contact between the hitman and the Adelson family through carrier records. Christopher Corbitt - Direct testimony highlight Tower dump analysis places Garcia's Miami phone at the Premier Health and Fitness cell site at 9:36 and 9:58 AM on the morning of the murder, consistent with surveilling Markel during his workout. Corbitt's sector analysis shows the relevant coverage arc pointed toward Premier Gym. Christopher Corbitt - Direct testimony highlight Frequency report analysis reveals Magbanua as Garcia's single most-called number and simultaneously Charlie Adelson's second most frequent contact, placing her at the intersection of the hitman and the alleged paymaster through independent carrier data. Christopher Corbitt - Direct “That number was associated with Miss Katherine Magbanua.” — Christopher Corbitt Frequency analysis of Garcia's call records — independent of any cooperating witness — identifies the defendant as the hitman's most frequently contacted number, providing a carrier-record anchor for the prosecution's intermediary theory. Christopher Corbitt - Direct “We did have a frequency report for Mr. Adelson, Mr. Charlie Adelson's records, and what we saw was that her number appeared in his records as well. And for the period of these particular records, it was the second most frequently contacted number.” — Christopher Corbitt Carrier records place Magbanua at the intersection of Garcia and Charlie Adelson: she was simultaneously the hitman's top contact and the alleged paymaster's second most frequent contact, corroborating the prosecution's claim that she was the conduit between them. Christopher Corbitt - Direct (Continued) “Well, we do see that at 8:57 there is an incoming 1-minute and 49-second call from Charlie Adelson, some text messages, and then a 25-minute phone call that began at 9:17, again with Mr. Charlie Adelson.” — Christopher Corbitt Corbitt establishes that immediately after Magbanua's phone registered consistent with the Comfort Rental Car location — while Garcia was picking up the June reconnaissance vehicle — she received a call from Charlie Adelson followed by a 25-minute conversation, directly linking Adelson to her activities that evening. Christopher Corbitt - Direct (Continued) testimony highlight Garcia's phone registered at Premier Health and Fitness at 9:36 and 9:58 a.m. on July 18, then went silent for over two hours covering the murder window. At 12:30 p.m., carrier notification patterns indicated the phone had just been powered back on in Alachua County. Garcia's first outgoing call connected to Katherine Magbanua for 20 seconds — confirmed in both carriers' records. Christopher Corbitt - Direct (Continued) “Uh, Ms. Magbanua.” — Christopher Corbitt Corbitt identifies that Garcia's first outgoing call after his phone powered back on following the murder-window blackout was to Katherine Magbanua — the alleged intermediary between the hitmen and the Adelson family. Christopher Corbitt - Direct (Continued) testimony highlight On the evening of July 18, after the hitmen returned to Miami, cell data placed all three handsets — Garcia, Rivera, and Magbanua — consistent with Rivera's 135th Street residence by approximately 9:46 p.m. Magbanua's Garcia communications, frequent throughout the evening, ceased abruptly once her phone registered on the same cell site as the hitmen. Christopher Corbitt - Direct (Continued) testimony highlight Corbitt confirmed that across all records reviewed, no Adelson family handset — Charlie, Wendi, Donna, or Harvey — ever directly communicated with Garcia's or Rivera's phones, except for the single unanswered July 1, 2014 voicemail Garcia left on Harvey Adelson's line identified in the tower dump. Christopher Corbitt - Direct (Continued) “No.” — Christopher Corbitt Corbitt's direct answer confirms that across all records reviewed, no Adelson family handset ever communicated with Garcia's phone — consistent with Magbanua serving as the sole communications layer between the Adelsons and the hitmen. OJP — Proffer on 'Tato' iCloud Contact / Richardson Hearing Argument testimony highlight Prosecution proffers Corbitt's testimony that Magbanua's iCloud contact list has the 934 number saved under the nickname 'Tato,' establishing her conscious association with that number and Rivera's street name. OJP — Proffer on 'Tato' iCloud Contact / Richardson Hearing Argument “That number is listed in her contacts as 'Tato.'” — Christopher Corbitt Core piece of the proffered testimony: Corbitt confirms from Magbanua's iCloud that Rivera's street name 'Tato' was the label she saved next to the 934 number — the linchpin of the prosecution's argument that she knowingly called Rivera during the reconnaissance and murder trips. OJP — Proffer on 'Tato' iCloud Contact / Richardson Hearing Argument ruling Wheeler rules no Richardson hearing is required: Corbitt's information derives from Magbanua's iCloud (already disclosed), not from any undisclosed Apple document, so the 'Tato' testimony is admissible. OJP — Proffer on 'Tato' iCloud Contact / Richardson Hearing Argument “if he's getting it from information that has been provided to you already, then there's no discovery violation and there's no reason to do a Richardson hearing in the first place. So it's going to be admissible.” — Robert R. Wheeler Wheeler's governing ruling: the 'Tato' testimony is admissible because its source — Magbanua's disclosed iCloud data — was already in defense hands, regardless of whether the separate Apple document was also produced. Christopher Corbitt - Direct (Continued) testimony highlight Corbitt confirms Magbanua's iCloud had Rivera's number saved as 'Tato' and that she called it — unsuccessfully — during the June 2014 reconnaissance trip, the first time in any records she called that number.
← Day 2 Magbanua Retrial Day 4 →