Skip to content
Magbanua Retrialtrial-daytrial-dayGeorgia CapplemanSarah Kathryn DuganChristopher DeCosteTara KawassChristopher CorbittErika JohnsonClariza LebredoYindra Velazquez MascaroRamzi NaberJune UmchindacrossredirectdirectDay 4 - May 23, 2022Cell-site testimony, employment and relationship witnesses, and rulings on recorded calls occupied the day.
← Day 3Magbanua RetrialDay 5 →

Day 4 - May 23, 2022

Cell-Site Testimony, Employment Witnesses, and Recorded-Call Rulings

Judge Robert R. Wheeler
26Proceedings
6Pages
6Witnesses
4,939Lines
Day 4 of 8
Appearing:

Cell-site testimony, employment and relationship witnesses, and rulings on recorded calls occupied the day.

Full day summary

Sergeant Christopher Corbitt completed cross-examination and redirect testimony about cell-site analysis, call-detail records, wiretap data, and communications involving Katherine Magbanua, Luis Rivera, and Sigfredo Garcia. He distinguished whether a handset location could be serviced by a cell site from placing a handset at a particular address. The court admitted defense maps and call-record exhibits, limited a Rivera location map to testimony rather than jury display, and admitted additional State exhibits. Yindra Velazquez Mascaro testified about her friendship with Magbanua, her accounts of Magbanua's relationships and work, and a statement made after Mascaro cared for Magbanua's children in July 2014. On cross-examination, she acknowledged uncertainty about dates and who paid for a breast surgery; after reviewing Instagram posts, she identified July 18, 2014, as the overnight stay. Former Club Fate owner Ramzi Naber described Magbanua's brief employment there and the loss of office records. June Umchinda described her relationship with Charlie Adelson, cash she observed, and what he told her about a Lexus. Adelson Institute employees described payroll practices and said they had not seen Magbanua work at the office, while acknowledging limits on what they knew about times they were not present. Outside the jury's presence, the court resolved disputes over recorded calls. It ruled that calls between defense counsel Tara Kawass and Garcia were work product and inadmissible. Following a Richardson analysis, it excluded untranslated Spanish jail calls because translation and transcription were unresolved, allowed English calls for the State's stated impeachment use, and set further scheduling and evidentiary matters.

Video thumbnail8:48:55
Watch →

1. Christopher Corbitt — Cross/Redirect

The court resolved discovery and evidentiary disputes before Sergeant Christopher Corbitt's continued cross-examination on the limits of phone and wiretap-record analysis.

→
Procedural
Work Product Dispute Over Defense Attorney's Recorded Calls with Garcia
105 lines

The court reserved ruling on recorded calls involving defense counsel and Garcia, ordered translations of Spanish calls, and planned a Richardson hearing.

Procedural
Apple Records Discovery Dispute — Phone Number Attribution Ruling
69 lines

The court allowed disputed Apple account records to be used, finding no discovery violation and ordering any unprovided related discovery produced by lunchtime.

Cross
Christopher Corbitt - Cross Christopher Corbitt Christopher DeCoste
1344 lines

Defense cross-examination emphasized that cell-site records show handset coverage consistency rather than exact locations, challenged filtered call summaries, and introduced maps and color-coded call records as Defense Exhibits 10 through 17.

Procedural
Mid-testimony recess and brief sidebar
16 lines

The court rejected a claimed sequestration violation and declined a curative instruction; defense counsel noted additional jail-call discovery.

Cross
Christopher Corbitt - Cross (Continued) Christopher Corbitt Christopher DeCoste
71 lines

Corbitt clarified wiretap logging, recording, and minimization procedures as the defense explored app-based communications and limits of the records.

Redirect
Christopher Corbitt - Redirect Christopher Corbitt Sarah Kathryn Dugan
392 lines

Corbitt clarified phone and cell-site records, described July 19 location inferences, and the court admitted two State exhibits while allowing limited prior-testimony audio.

Procedural
State's Exhibit 133 Played — Recorded Statements on Garcia-Adelson Contact; Lunch Recess
40 lines
Procedural
Pre-Lunch Housekeeping — Defense Rule of Completeness Argument Denied
15 lines

2. Yindra Velazquez Mascaro — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recall

Yindra Velazquez Mascaro's testimony continued, with questioning focused on her recollection, investigative-report inaccuracies, and Instagram posts that dated a July 2014 account.

→
Direct
Yindra Velazquez Mascaro - Direct Yindra Velazquez Mascaro Sarah Kathryn Dugan
603 lines

A longtime friend described Magbanua's relationships, work history, and an attributed July 2014 account; the court admitted several location, photograph, and vehicle exhibits.

Cross
Yindra Velazquez Mascaro - Cross Yindra Velazquez Mascaro Tara Kawass
770 lines

Mascaro acknowledged uncertainty about several dates and said an unrecorded 2016 police report misstated her uncertainty over who paid for Magbanua's surgery.

Redirect
Yindra Velazquez Mascaro - Redirect Yindra Velazquez Mascaro Sarah Kathryn Dugan
84 lines

Mascaro clarified limits on her knowledge of Magbanua's payroll arrangement and surgery payment, reaffirmed an error in a police report, and described her limited reaction to Garcia's arrest.

Procedural
Afternoon Recess — Prosecution Requests Mascaro Recall for Instagram Date Clarification
14 lines
Direct
Yindra Velazquez Mascaro - Direct (Recall) Yindra Velazquez Mascaro Sarah Kathryn Dugan
17 lines

Mascaro used her Instagram to identify July 18, 2014, as the night Magbanua's children stayed with her.

Cross
Yindra Velazquez Mascaro - Cross (Recall) Yindra Velazquez Mascaro Tara Kawass
14 lines

Mascaro confirmed that her Instagram posts identified the exact day and provided a record of it.

3. Ramzi Naber — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Former Club Fate owner Ramzi Naber testified that Katherine Magbanua worked as a cocktail server for about three months, with employee records later destroyed by water damage.

→
Direct
Ramzi Naber - Direct Ramzi Naber Sarah Kathryn Dugan
243 lines

Club Fate's former owner described its operations, Magbanua's brief work as a cocktail server, employee earnings, and the loss of office records to water damage.

Cross
Ramzi Naber - Cross Ramzi Naber Christopher DeCoste
157 lines

Naber acknowledged limits on his income estimates, memory, and access to Club Fate records; the court admitted a defense photograph of Magbanua.

Redirect
Ramzi Naber - Redirect Ramzi Naber Sarah Kathryn Dugan
17 lines

Naber reaffirmed Magbanua's limited employment at Club Fate and confirmed credit-card tipping practices.

4. June Umchinda — Direct/Cross

June Umchinda described cash she saw at Charlie Adelson's home and his statement about giving Katherine Magbanua an older Lexus; the defense questioned her limited knowledge of Magbanua and the murder.

→
Direct
June Umchinda - Direct June Umchinda Georgia Cappleman
179 lines

June Umchinda described her relationship with Charlie Adelson, limited observations of cash at his home, and what he told her about an older Lexus provided to Katherine Magbanua.

Cross
June Umchinda - Cross June Umchinda Tara Kawass
345 lines

June Umchinda said she had limited knowledge of Charles Adelson's connection to Katherine Magbanua or the homicide investigation, as the defense explored media exposure and her 2018 interview.

5. Clariza Lebredo — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Clariza Lebredo described Adelson Institute staffing and payroll practices, then acknowledged on cross-examination that she did not know several details about visits and payment arrangements.

→
Direct
Clariza Lebredo - Direct Clariza Lebredo Sarah Kathryn Dugan
135 lines

Lebredo described Adelson Institute operations and said Magbanua was a one-time dental patient, not someone she saw working there.

Cross
Clariza Lebredo - Cross Clariza Lebredo Tara Kawass
33 lines

Lebredo said she lacked knowledge of the Adelsons' check-writing practices and any arrangement involving Magbanua's paychecks.

Redirect
Clariza Lebredo - Redirect Clariza Lebredo Sarah Kathryn Dugan
28 lines

Lebredo said multiple sequential paychecks occurred once a year and that Magbanua was not part of the office cleaning team.

6. Erika Johnson — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Erika Johnson testified about Adelson Institute practices and what she knew about Katherine Magbanua's possible work there. After the jury left, the court ruled on jail-call evidence and discussed the remaining schedule.

→
Direct
Erika Johnson - Direct Erika Johnson Sarah Kathryn Dugan
148 lines

Johnson said she never saw Magbanua work at the Adelson Institute and described its staffing, payroll, and a recorded 2016 call to Charlie Adelson after agents requested records.

Cross
Erika Johnson - Cross Erika Johnson Tara Kawass
52 lines

Johnson acknowledged uncertainty in her earlier testimony about Katie's employment and limits on her knowledge of Adelson Institute check-writing.

Redirect
Erika Johnson - Redirect Erika Johnson Sarah Kathryn Dugan
18 lines

Johnson said the Adelson Institute did not schedule patients on Fridays but qualified that she did not know what occurred there when she was absent.

Procedural
End of Day — Jail Call Admissibility Rulings and Scheduling
30 lines

The court excluded counsel-and-Garcia and Spanish jail calls, allowed English calls for the State's stated impeachment use, and set a Crawford hearing and Wednesday jury-instruction deadline.

← Day 3Magbanua RetrialDay 5 →