Skip to content
Magbanua Retrial trial-day trial-day Georgia CapplemanSarah Kathryn DuganChristopher DeCosteTara KawassLouis BronsteinOscar Jimenez Jr.Patrick SanfordJames Keith McElveenElizabeth RicheyMary HullJessica RodriguezdirectcrossredirectDay 5 - May 24, 2022 Day 5 moved through six witnesses and multiple evidentiary rulings. Fraud examiner Mary Hull documented a $46,820 cash deposit surge in Magbanua's 2014 accounts — including $17,300 in the six weeks after Dan Markel's murder — while Rivera's banking pattern shifted abruptly after the killing. FBI undercover agent Oscar Jimenez played the April 2016 bump of Donna Adelson for the jury. Surveillance agent Louis Bronstein and audio forensics expert James McElveen introduced the Dolce Vita recording. FBI co-lead Patrick Sanford began his direct, describing a RICO wiretap scrub that found one July 1 Garcia-to-Harvey Adelson call that may have routed to voicemail and no other listed Garcia-to-Adelson contact and walking through five post-bump wiretap calls that placed Charlie Adelson in contact with Magbanua.
← Day 4 Magbanua Retrial Day 6 →

Day 5 - May 24, 2022

Day 5 — Financial Records, FBI Undercover Bump, and Lead Agent Testimony Begin

Judge Robert R. Wheeler
18 Proceedings
7 Pages
7 Witnesses
3,765 Lines
Day 5 of 8
Appearing:

Day 5 moved through six witnesses and multiple evidentiary rulings. Fraud examiner Mary Hull documented a $46,820 cash deposit surge in Magbanua's 2014 accounts — including $17,300 in the six weeks after Dan Markel's murder — while Rivera's banking pattern shifted abruptly after the killing. FBI undercover agent Oscar Jimenez played the April 2016 bump of Donna Adelson for the jury. Surveillance agent Louis Bronstein and audio forensics expert James McElveen introduced the Dolce Vita recording. FBI co-lead Patrick Sanford began his direct, describing a RICO wiretap scrub that found one July 1 Garcia-to-Harvey Adelson call that may have routed to voicemail and no other listed Garcia-to-Adelson contact and walking through five post-bump wiretap calls that placed Charlie Adelson in contact with Magbanua.

Full day summary

Day 5 opened with two contested pre-testimony rulings. Judge Wheeler admitted Exhibit 100 — a wiretap call in which Charlie Adelson discussed Erica Johnson's employment records while FBI agents were present at the Adelson Institute with a subpoena — as a non-hearsay statement offered to show the parties' conduct rather than the truth of Adelson's statements. Wheeler also rejected a Crawford/Confrontation Clause challenge to the Adelson bump wiretap calls, holding that the Confrontation Clause does not attach to statements admitted on a non-hearsay basis and citing Thurston v. State, 307 So. 3d 714. Defense counsel DeCoste made a full preserved record, arguing that the State's own stated purpose — proving Magbanua was not named — was itself a truth-of-the-matter-asserted use. FDLE firearms analyst Elizabeth Richey established that both projectiles recovered from Dan Markel's head were fired from the same firearm and were consistent with .38 Special or .357 Magnum cartridges from a revolver — directly accounting for the absence of shell casings at the scene. Cross-examination was brief, confined to the theoretical inference that the unrecovered weapon could be linked to other crimes. Jessica Rodriguez, Luis Rivera's ex-girlfriend and mother of his daughter, testified about a summer 2014 package delivery to her Miami apartment in which Garcia arrived with a suspicious package wrapped to resemble a drug brick, Magbanua accompanied him but waited in the car, then came inside and appeared visibly anxious and ready to leave. Cappleman read back Rodriguez's 2019 deposition statement — that Magbanua "knew everything that Tuto did when it came to bad stuff — everything" — over a defense objection. Cross-examination by Kawass attacked the disclosure's origins: Rodriguez had not mentioned the package incident to police in June 2016, and her first disclosure came only after Rivera's investigator called and asked specifically whether she remembered a drug transaction between Garcia and Magbanua, the day before Magbanua's arrest. Kawass also confronted Rodriguez with a loyalty email pledging unconditional support to Rivera and prior inconsistent statements that placed the incident later in the year and described Magbanua as having already left before Rivera retrieved the package. On redirect, Rodriguez denied willingness to lie under oath and clarified that it was she — not Magbanua — who asked what was in the bag. Certified fraud examiner Mary Hull then presented comprehensive financial analysis covering Magbanua, Garcia, Rivera, and the Adelson family from 2013 through 2016. Hull documented a sharp post-murder cash pattern in Magbanua's accounts: $13,035 in total cash deposits in 2013, rising to $46,820 in 2014, with the single highest month being August 2014 at $13,200 during a documented employment gap. In the six weeks immediately after the murder, Magbanua deposited $17,300 in cash with no employment record to explain the source. Rivera's own banking shifted abruptly on July 16, 2014, two days before the murder — his longstanding pattern of cashing out paychecks and overdrafting stopped entirely through November 2014. Hull also analyzed the 44 Adelson Institute paychecks Magbanua received — all signed by Donna Adelson, with sequential check numbering Hull described as atypical for payroll and 22 instances of advance pay — and found that the checks stopped entirely after Garcia's arrest. A $4,400 cash payment for a breast augmentation could not be traced to any bank withdrawal. No traceable payment appeared for the 2016 transfer of Harvey Adelson's Lexus. Cross-examination by DeCoste narrowed the analysis by identifying cash income sources Hull had not reviewed — nightclub work, cash-paying employers, and Sigfredo Garcia's own cash support — and obtaining Hull's concession that she could not determine the source of the cash. Hull identified Donna Adelson, who signed all 44 checks, as the person best positioned to explain the check-writing practices. On redirect, Dugan established that Club Fate employment DeCoste cited occurred in April–June 2015, after the August 2014 cash peak, and that Magbanua's 2013–2015 tax returns reported no cash tips or bar and restaurant employment. Oscar Jimenez Jr. testified about the FBI's April 19, 2016 undercover bump of Donna Adelson. Posing as a Latin King gang member, Jimenez approached her on a Miami street, handed her a flyer bearing Markel's photograph, a handwritten $5,000 figure, and his undercover number, and told her his incarcerated "brother" had helped her family resolve their "problem up north" while asking support "the way you're taking care of Katie." The jury heard the recorded audio. Cross-examination established that the FBI did not retain a copy of the exact flyer handed to Adelson, contrary to standard practice, and challenged whether naming "Katie" and "Tuto" in the script provided Adelson a communication roadmap rather than producing organic evidence. FBI surveillance agent Louis Bronstein testified about an April 20, 2016 meeting between Charlie Adelson and Magbanua at Dolce Vita restaurant in Miami, where he and a second agent sat at an adjacent table. Heavy background noise left Bronstein able to discern only one audible fragment — Adelson saying something to the effect of "And then she turned" — during a brief moment when the building's air handler cut out. Bronstein observed that Adelson got up and stormed out at some point during the roughly one-hour meeting. Forensic audio engineer James McElveen explained that Wave Sciences' proprietary voice-focusing tool was applied to the raw FBI recordings after standard techniques yielded minimal improvement. On cross, DeCoste asked McElveen about at least eight instances in which Adelson said "What was that?" while sitting approximately two and a half feet from Magbanua; McElveen agreed that Magbanua was difficult for Adelson to hear at those points. Enhanced audio (Exhibit 115) and a composite video-plus-audio exhibit (Exhibit 116) were admitted after a brief numbering mix-up between Exhibits 114 and 116 was resolved outside the jury's presence. Judge Wheeler sharply rebuked DeCoste when defense raised an unsupported disc-tampering inference during the corrective colloquy. The day closed with the beginning of FBI co-lead Patrick Sanford's direct examination. Sanford testified that the FBI cross-referenced the RICO wiretap covering Rivera's Latin King network against Adelson family numbers and found one July 1 call from Garcia's number to Harvey Adelson's number that may have routed to voicemail, with no listed contact beyond it. He described Rivera's cooperation (30–40 hours of sessions conducted without leading) and identified independent corroborations of Rivera's account. Turning to the post-bump wiretap calls, Sanford walked through five calls from April 19–20, 2016: Donna Adelson's first call after the bump went to Charlie; neither ever named "Katie," "Dan Markel," or "Tuto/Tato"; and Donna's cryptic reference to a "TV" worth about "$5,000" connected, through Sanford's testimony, to Wendi Adelson's prior statement that Charlie had joked a TV was cheaper than a hitman. Sanford testified that Charlie then called Magbanua — not his other known ex-girlfriends — and that in one call Charlie relayed details to Magbanua that Donna had not conveyed to him on the recorded calls. Sanford's direct examination continued the following morning.

Video thumbnail 8:59:40
Watch →

1. Elizabeth Richey — Direct/Cross

Before the jury entered on Day 5, Judge Wheeler admitted a phone call involving Charlie Adelson over a non-hearsay ruling and rejected a Crawford challenge to the FBI-bump Adelson wiretaps. FDLE firearms analyst Elizabeth Richey then testified that both bullets recovered from Dan Markel's head were fired from the same firearm and were most consistent with .38 Special or .357 Magnum cartridges; the absence of shell casings was consistent with, but did not identify, a revolver.

Procedural
Pre-Testimony Motions: Exhibit 100 Ruling and Crawford Challenge to Adelson Wiretaps

Judge Wheeler rules Exhibit 100, a call in which Charlie Adelson disclaimed control over employment records sought by law enforcement, admissible as non-hearsay, then rejects a Crawford challenge to the Adelson bump calls.

Direct
Elizabeth Richey Georgia Cappleman
65 lines

FDLE firearms analyst Elizabeth Richey testifies that both projectiles recovered from Dan Markel's head were fired from the same revolver, and explains why the absence of cartridge casings at the scene is consistent with that weapon type.

Cross
Elizabeth Richey Tara Kawass
12 lines

On a two-question cross, Richey says it is possible that a recovered firearm could be compared with the projectiles and possibly linked to other crimes if comparison bullets were available.

Highlights

2. Jessica Rodriguez — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Jessica Rodriguez's direct, cross, and redirect testimony about Rivera's stated reason for leaving town and the wrapped-package visit.

Direct
Jessica Rodriguez Georgia Cappleman
272 lines

Jessica Rodriguez describes an unidentified wrapped package Garcia brought for Rivera while Magbanua was present within about a month of Rodriguez's daughter's June 2014 birth, qualifies her recollection of Magbanua's conduct, and confirms a prior broad deposition statement after first saying she did not know what Garcia kept from Magbanua.

Cross
Jessica Rodriguez Tara Kawass
636 lines

Defense counsel Tara Kawass cross-examines Jessica Rodriguez, challenging the timing of the package-delivery incident and of Rodriguez's knowledge that Katherine Magbanua was dating Charlie Adelson, while eliciting Luis Rivera's criminal history and Rodriguez's continued personal loyalty to him.

Redirect
Jessica Rodriguez Georgia Cappleman
71 lines

On redirect, Rodriguez denies coaching or a willingness to lie for Rivera, explains how a residence move helped her date the package visit, and clarifies that she—not Magbanua—asked what was in the bag.

Procedural
Midmorning Recess and Trooper Downing Logistics Note

Judge Wheeler calls a 15-minute midmorning recess; defense counsel flags that subpoenaed FHP Trooper Downing has not responded and asks prosecution to assist with contact.

Highlights

3. Mary Hull — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Mary Hull's financial testimony spans direct, cross, and redirect on this page, covering bank records, Adelson Institute checks, and untraced cash deposits linked to the period surrounding the murder. A midday recess includes a sidebar about two FBI undercover bump-call recordings the prosecution plans to introduce through afternoon witnesses.

Direct
Mary Hull Sarah Kathryn Dugan
944 lines

Forensic accountant Mary Hull presents records and charts for Rivera, Garcia, Magbanua, and the Adelson Institute, describing cash deposits, withdrawals, checks, vehicle records, and purchase dates in relation to the case timeline without identifying the source of untraced cash.

Procedural
Lunch Recess and Exhibit Preview — FBI Undercover Bump Calls

During the lunch recess, counsel distinguish Exhibit 128, an undercover-agent call to the Adelson Institute, from Exhibit 134, a Charlie Adelson call to the undercover number.

Cross
Mary Hull Christopher DeCoste
374 lines

DeCoste establishes limits in Hull's record-based analysis, proposes unquantified cash-work and support categories, and elicits that a January 2016 message describes the Lexus as a purchase before the arrests; Hull cannot identify the source of the cash deposits.

Redirect
Mary Hull Sarah Kathryn Dugan
93 lines

Forensic accountant Mary Hull returns to the stand on redirect, where the prosecution clarifies that a January 2015 Adelson Institute payment coincided with a visit to Harvey Adelson himself, confirms no bank records show any payment for the Lexus transfer, and elicits that Magbanua's tax filings report no bar or club employment or cash tips.

Highlights

4. Oscar Jimenez Jr. — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Retired FBI Agent Oscar Jimenez Jr. testifies about the April 2016 undercover "bump" of Donna Adelson in Miami — posing as a Latin King member, handing her a flyer referencing Markel's murder and a $5,000 figure, and telling her his incarcerated "brother" had helped her family resolve their "problem up north." Cross-examination challenges the operation's failure to retain a copy of the flyer and argues the scripted name-drops — "Katie," "Tuto," "your family" — coached rather than tested Adelson. Redirect confirms the undercover number in Jimenez's contemporaneous FBI 302 report, while Jimenez says only that he believes the report records the $5,000 amount. After an afternoon recess, defense counsel reports an FHP trooper under subpoena has not responded to any contact attempts.

Direct
Oscar Jimenez Jr. Georgia Cappleman
133 lines

Retired FBI Special Agent Oscar Jimenez Jr. describes posing as a gang member to hand Donna Adelson a flyer referencing Dan Markel's murder, and the jury hears his recorded street-side message telling her to look after his incarcerated 'brother' the way her family was looking after 'Katie.'

Cross
Oscar Jimenez Jr. Christopher DeCoste
57 lines

Defense challenges the FBI's Donna Adelson bump operation, extracting an admission that the bureau failed to copy the exact flyer handed to her, and pressing Jimenez on whether naming 'Katie' and 'Tuto' in the script gave Adelson a roadmap rather than allowing organic post-bump communication.

Redirect
Oscar Jimenez Jr. Georgia Cappleman
14 lines

On redirect, Jimenez says his FBI 302 contains the undercover number and believes it also contains the $5,000 figure.

Procedural
Afternoon Recess and Defense Notice of Unresponsive Subpoenaed Witness

Judge Wheeler calls the afternoon recess; upon return, defense counsel DeCoste alerts the court that a subpoenaed FHP trooper from Gainesville has not responded despite repeated contact attempts.

Highlights

5. Louis Bronstein — Direct/Cross

FBI Special Agent Louis Bronstein describes his April 2016 undercover surveillance of a meeting between Charlie Adelson and Katherine Magbanua at Dolce Vita in Miami, authenticating the recording exhibit. Defense cross examines documentation practices and Magbanua's observed demeanor.

Direct
Louis Bronstein Georgia Cappleman
99 lines

FBI surveillance agent Bronstein describes positioning himself next to Charlie Adelson and Katherine Magbanua at Dolce Vita restaurant in April 2016, laying foundation for Exhibit 114 — the audio-video recording of their meeting — while explaining that restaurant noise limited intelligible audio to a single sentence fragment spoken by Adelson.

Cross
Louis Bronstein Christopher DeCoste
19 lines

On brief cross, Bronstein gives a qualified description of DOJ recording protocol and says his assessment of Magbanua was that she appeared engaged in conversation.

Highlights

6. James Keith McElveen — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Forensic audio engineer James Keith McElveen testifies on his enhancement of FBI recordings made at Dolce Vita restaurant in April 2016, followed by a colloquy resolving a mix-up between Dolce Vita exhibits before the jury.

Direct
James Keith McElveen Georgia Cappleman
77 lines

Forensic audio engineer James Keith McElveen describes his enhancement of the FBI's Dolce Vita restaurant surveillance recording, explains the severe audio conditions that made the raw recording largely unintelligible, and introduces Exhibit 115 — his best-efforts enhanced audio — which captured Charlie Adelson's voice far more clearly than Katherine Magbanua's.

Cross
James Keith McElveen Christopher DeCoste
59 lines

On cross, McElveen distinguishes the rushed first pass from the later processing, says he did not feel a specific deadline pressure, and explains why the male voice was more prominent.

Redirect
James Keith McElveen Georgia Cappleman
20 lines

Cappleman confirms the final audio product and asks for a recess so McElveen can review the combined video-audio item and verify whether it contains his audio.

Procedural
Exhibit Mix-Up Corrected: Dolce Vita Recordings 114 and 116 Clarified Out of Jury

With the jury out, counsel and the court untangle a numbering error in the Dolce Vita surveillance exhibits — Cappleman showed Bronstein Exhibit 116 (the composite) while labeling it 114 (raw footage). Defense declines to stipulate; Wheeler rebukes DeCoste for implying disc tampering; Bronstein is set to be recalled; McElveen proffers Exhibit 116 on the record.

Redirect
James Keith McElveen Georgia Cappleman
15 lines

Following a brief recess, the court resumes McElveen's redirect, admits Exhibit 116 (the combined enhanced-audio-plus-video composite) without objection, and excuses the witness after Cappleman clarifies the distinction between Exhibits 115 and 116.

7. Patrick Sanford — Direct (Part 1)

Agent Bronstein's brief recall admits the raw Dolce Vita surveillance disc, after which FBI Special Agent Patrick Sanford begins direct testimony on phone records, Rivera's debriefings, the Prius bullet hole, the Institute subpoena call, and the scripted bump.

Direct
Louis Bronstein Georgia Cappleman

Brief recall of FBI surveillance agent Bronstein to formally admit State's Exhibit 114 — the disc containing raw audio-video from both agents at the Dolce Vita restaurant — correcting the exhibit numbering error flagged in the prior housekeeping session.

Direct
Patrick Sanford Georgia Cappleman
583 lines

Sanford describes the reviewed communications data, Rivera debriefings and selected corroboration, the unsuccessful weapon search, surveillance, and the scripted bump-generated calls, while preserving the limits of what the records and recordings establish.

Procedural
Jury Sent Home — End-of-Day Housekeeping

End-of-day housekeeping covers a juror chair safety issue, a court order sealing all jail calls produced during trial, a defense objection to prosecution's improper suggestion that the court selected evidence, and scheduling discussion projecting the defense case through Thursday.

Highlights

Patrick Sanford - Direct (Part 1) evidence event Sanford says investigators' review of the RICO wiretap and collected phone data revealed no listed contact between Rivera, Garcia, Latin King members, and the Adelson family beyond one July 1 call from Garcia's phone to Harvey Adelson after a reported jet-ski incident. That is the scope of the record-based finding. Patrick Sanford - Direct (Part 1) “That's correct. Mr. Rivera told us that. We were unaware of it at the time.” — Patrick Sanford Confirms investigators learned of the Prius bullet hole from Rivera before independently verifying it, corroborating his account with physical evidence they had not previously discovered. Patrick Sanford - Direct (Part 1) testimony highlight Sanford explains the FBI's April 2016 undercover 'bump,' in which an agent approached Donna Adelson with a flyer referencing Dan Markel and $5,000 and used the names 'Katie' and 'Tuto' to make the scripted approach appear based on inside information and prompt recorded communication. Patrick Sanford - Direct (Part 1) “The bump was basically a way for us to get activity started. We had the wire going, and we figured that they probably weren't talking about anything anymore since it's been a year, over a year, since the homicide had occurred. So we wanted to generate information to make them believe that Mr. Rivera, who's currently in prison, was cooperating— or actually not cooperating at that time that he was actually talking to other jailmates, other cellmates, and people in the jail, and had actually provided information about the murder to somebody else, and that that person was trying to extort the Adelsons for more money.” — Patrick Sanford Explains the FBI's operational strategy behind the 2016 undercover approach to Donna Adelson, the source of much of the wiretap evidence played in this proceeding.
← Day 4 Magbanua Retrial Day 6 →