Skip to content
Garcia–Magbanuatrial-daytrial-dayGeorgia CapplemanAnna NorrisChristopher DeCosteTara KawassSaam ZangenehCraig IsomRobert Shawn YaoWendi AdelsonRonald Wittdirectcrossredirectrecrossre_redirectjury_questionDay 2 - September 27, 2019The court ruled on Yao's conditional shooter-height opinion, investigators described surveillance and records, and Wendi Adelson testified under use immunity.
← Day 1Garcia–MagbanuaDay 3 →

Day 2 - September 27, 2019

Yao Testimony, Investigative Records, and Wendi Adelson

Judge James C. Hankinson
22Proceedings
4Pages
4Witnesses
4,050Lines
Day 2 of 11
Appearing:

The court ruled on Yao's conditional shooter-height opinion, investigators described surveillance and records, and Wendi Adelson testified under use immunity.

Full day summary

The court addressed a discovery violation involving Investigator Robert Shawn Yao's updated opinion, denied exclusion after finding no procedural prejudice, and denied Garcia's untimely request for a Daubert hearing. Yao then testified that, under stated assumptions, the available evidence was more consistent with a taller rather than shorter shooter. On cross-examination, he agreed the physical evidence alone did not permit a trajectory analysis and that missing points and changed assumptions limited the certainty of his opinion. Lead investigator Craig Isom described surveillance, toll, rental, phone, and financial records in the investigation. He testified that a toll-record search led to a rental agreement listing Luis Rivera as renter of a Toyota Prius. Cross-examination addressed gaps in the surveillance footage, limits on vehicle identification, an unrecorded September 30 cooperation interview with Rivera, and investigative omissions. Isom said the recovered Prius's tag and vehicle identification number matched the SunPass records. Ronald Witt authenticated T-Mobile tower-dump records, which the court admitted without objection. Outside the jury's presence, the court compelled Wendi Adelson to testify under use immunity and required that her testimony be completed that day. Adelson testified about her divorce and custody dispute with Dan Markel, her limited acquaintance with Katherine Magbanua, a repeated hitman-and-television joke by Charles Adelson, and her movements on the day Markel was killed. She denied involvement in or knowledge of a plot to kill Markel and said she did not visit the crime scene. Juror questions addressed the scope of her immunity, documents used to refresh her memory, and her decision to limit Markel's parents' contact with the children.

Video thumbnail7:39:16
Watch →

1. Yao Evidence and Disclosure Rulings; Robert Shawn Yao — Direct (Continued)/Cross/Redirect

The court allowed Investigator Robert Shawn Yao's conditional taller-shooter opinion after denying exclusion requests, then Yao testified and faced cross-examination about the assumptions and limits of his analysis.

Procedural
Yao Daubert Ruling and Rivera-Attorney Depositions
111 lines

The court allowed Yao's trajectory testimony, ordered same-day depositions of Rivera's attorneys, and denied a renewed severance motion.

Direct
Robert Shawn Yao - Direct Robert Shawn Yao Georgia Cappleman
52 lines

Yao gave a conditional expert opinion that the bullet-path evidence was more consistent with a taller shooter; the court overruled a speculation objection.

Cross
Robert Shawn Yao - Cross Robert Shawn Yao Saam Zangeneh
84 lines

Yao agreed the physical evidence alone did not permit a trajectory analysis and that changes to the assumed shooting conditions could affect his opinion.

Cross
Robert Shawn Yao - Cross Robert Shawn Yao Christopher DeCoste
40 lines

Yao said his taller-shooter opinion relied on assumptions and could not be stated with 100 percent certainty.

Redirect
Robert Shawn Yao - Redirect Robert Shawn Yao Georgia Cappleman
23 lines

Yao said his conditional taller-shooter opinion allowed straight or slightly bent arms and that an alternative shooting stance would decrease accuracy.

2. Craig Isom — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross; Rivera-Attorney Deposition Logistics

Lead investigator Craig Isom continued his Day 2 testimony, describing surveillance, toll, rental, phone, and financial-record evidence while the defense questioned investigative gaps and Rivera's unrecorded cooperation interview.

Direct
Craig Isom - Direct Craig Isom Georgia Cappleman
925 lines

Lead investigator Craig Isom traced surveillance, toll, rental, Facebook, and phone records as the State connected a Prius rental to Luis Rivera and the defendants' alleged network.

Cross
Craig Isom - Cross Craig Isom Saam Zangeneh
451 lines

Isom acknowledged surveillance and vehicle-identification limits, discussed rental and phone-record gaps, and identified one short Garcia-Harvey Adelson call.

Cross
Craig Isom - Cross Craig Isom Christopher DeCoste
645 lines

Magbanua's counsel challenged Isom's investigative theory, an unrecorded Rivera interview, and gaps in efforts to trace Magbanua's cash and reported employment.

Redirect
Craig Isom - Redirect Craig Isom Georgia Cappleman
200 lines

Isom addressed financial and Prius-identification records, explained why Rivera's first cooperation interview was not recorded, and answered juror questions about the investigation.

Recross
Craig Isom - Recross Craig Isom Saam Zangeneh
117 lines

Isom acknowledged Rivera initially denied involvement, described the recorded and unrecorded interviews, and said he did not know the plea terms.

Recross
Craig Isom - Recross Craig Isom Christopher DeCoste
85 lines

Isom acknowledged that his report did not explain why Rivera's September 30 cooperation interview was unrecorded.

Re-Direct
Craig Isom - Re-redirect Craig Isom Georgia Cappleman
5 lines

The State asked no further questions, and Craig Isom stepped down subject to the rule.

4. Wendi Adelson — Immunity Rulings, Testimony, and Juror Questions

Wendi Adelson testified about the divorce and custody dispute with Dan Markel, denied knowledge of a plan to kill him, and faced cross-examination and juror questions before the court released her from further testimony.

Procedural
Wendi Adelson Immunity and Cross-Examination Timing Wendi Adelson
46 lines

The court compelled Wendi Adelson's testimony under use immunity and ordered that her examination be completed that day.

Direct
Wendi Adelson - Direct Wendi Adelson Georgia Cappleman
546 lines

Wendi Adelson testified about the divorce and custody dispute with Dan Markel, her family relationships, her movements on the day of the murder, and her claimed lack of knowledge of any plot.

Cross
Wendi Adelson - Cross Wendi Adelson Saam Zangeneh
100 lines

Garcia's counsel explored Wendi Adelson's knowledge of Charlie's lifestyle and alleged drug-related contacts; she often said she did not know.

Cross
Wendi Adelson - Cross Wendi Adelson Tara Kawass
391 lines

Tara Kawass questioned Wendi Adelson about family ties, recordings, her limited contact with Katherine Magbanua, and events surrounding Dan Markel's murder; the court limited two lines of inquiry.

Redirect
Wendi Adelson - Redirect Wendi Adelson Georgia Cappleman
27 lines

Wendi Adelson addressed family contact with the children and the trust fiduciary appointment.

Jury Questions
Wendi Adelson - Juror Questions Wendi Adelson James C. Hankinson
52 lines

Juror questions addressed Wendi Adelson's immunity, refreshed memory, relationship timing, and stated reason for limiting the Markel grandparents' contact with the children.

Jury Questions
Wendi Adelson - Juror Question Follow-up by the State Wendi Adelson Georgia Cappleman
13 lines

Wendi Adelson agreed that Dan's mother proposed temporary help for the children if arrests occurred, but said she viewed it as an effort to take her children.

Jury Questions
Wendi Adelson - Juror Question Follow-up by Magbanua Wendi Adelson Tara Kawass
14 lines

Wendi Adelson said she could not remember the exact timing of an email discussed in relation to Katherine Magbanua's arrest.

Procedural
Wendi Adelson Immunity Instruction and End-of-Day Logistics
26 lines
← Day 1Garcia–MagbanuaDay 3 →